Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

B.M.Gopi Krishna vs Deepika Mai
2023 Latest Caselaw 5430 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5430 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 June, 2023

Madras High Court
B.M.Gopi Krishna vs Deepika Mai on 5 June, 2023
                                                                         C.R.P.(MD) No.2168 of 2022

                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                 DATED : 05.06.2023

                                                         CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

                                              C.R.P.(MD) No.2168 of 2022
                                                         and
                                             C.M.P.(MD) No.10054 of 2022

                    B.M.Gopi Krishna                                             ... Petitioner

                                                           Vs.

                    Deepika mai                                                 ... Respondent


                              Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution
                    of India, to set aside the Judgment and Decree passed in I.A.No.102 of
                    2022 in H.M.O.P.No.836 of 2021 dated 02.09.2022 on the file of the
                    Family Court, Madurai.


                                    For Petitioner     : M/s.K.R.Shivashankari

                                    For Respondent     : Mr.R.Gowrishankar

                                                         ******

                                                       ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the Judgment

and Decree dated 02.09.2022 passed by the Family Court, Madurai in

I.A.No.102 of 2022 in H.M.O.P.No.836 of 2021.

_____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.R.P.(MD) No.2168 of 2022

2. By the impugned order dated 02.09.2022, the Family Court,

Madurai has dismissed I.A.No.102 of 2022 filed by the petitioner. I.A.No.

102 of 2022 was filed by the petitioner under Section 11 of Code of Civil

Procedure, 1908 to dismiss H.M.O.P.No.836 of 2021. H.M.O.P.No.836 of

2021 was filed by the respondent under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu

Marriage Act, 1955 to dissolve the marriage solemnized on 12.12.2013

between the petitioner and the respondent, on the ground of cruelty.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the marriage

that was solemnized between the petitioner and the respondent on

12.12.2013 had already been declared as a nullity vide fair and decreetal

order dated 21.05.2014 passed in H.M.O.P.No.90 of 2014 filed by the

petitioner under Section 12(1)(a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

4. It is submitted that the Family Court has committed a grave error

while dismissing the I.A.No.102 of 2022 filed by the petitioner under

Section 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure as the subsequent

H.M.O.P.No.836 of 2021 filed by the respondent was clearly barred under

law.

_____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.R.P.(MD) No.2168 of 2022

5. Per contra, the learned counsel for the respondent submits that

the petitioner has obtained the Decree in H.M.O.P.No.90 of 2014 by

misleading the facts and that even though after the Decree that came to be

passed on 21.05.2014 in H.M.O.P.No.90 of 2014, the petitioner took the

respondent to U.S., lived with the respondent and introduced her to the

society and his friends as his wife. It is submitted that therefore, the

respondent is independently entitled to initiate a proceedings to dissolve

the marriage solemnized between the petitioner and the respondent on

12.12.2013.

6. I have considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel

for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent.

7. H.M.O.P.No.836 of 2021 filed by the respondent under Section

13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 to dissolve the marriage

solemnized between the petitioner and the respondent on 12.12.2013

cannot be countenanced in the light of the earlier Decree passed on

21.05.2014 in H.M.O.P.No.90 of 2014. The decision of the Family Court

is therefore unsustainable. It is liable to be interfered with. Therefore, the

impugned order dated 02.09.2022 in I.A.No.102 of 2022 in H.M.O.P.No.

_____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.R.P.(MD) No.2168 of 2022

836 of 2021 is set aside. Consequently, I.A.No.102 of 2022 filed under

Section 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 deserves to be allowed.

8. The observations contained in this order shall be without

prejudice to the rights of the respondent to exercise rights, if any, out the

alleged declaration made by the petitioner before the officials and

statutory bodies in India and abroad.

9. This present Civil Revision Petition is accordingly allowed. No

costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

05.06.2023 NCC : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Index: Yes/ No jen

To

The Family Court, Madurai.

_____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.R.P.(MD) No.2168 of 2022

C.SARAVANAN, J.

jen

C.R.P.(MD) No.2168 of 2022 and C.M.P.(MD) No.10054 of 2022

05.06.2023

_____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter