Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5424 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 June, 2023
W.A.(MD) No.678 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 05.06.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
and
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
W.A.(MD) No.678 of 2023
and
C.M.P.(MD) No.6023 of 2023
M.Ganesan ... Appellant
-vs-
1. V. Nagarajan
2. Parkath Ali
3. Arab John
4. Sridar
5. Sivanandan
6. Subramaniyan
7. Lakshmi
8. The Special Deputy Collector,(Revenue),
O/o.The Special Revenue Deputy Collector Court,
____________
Page 1 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.(MD) No.678 of 2023
Trichy Town.
9. The District Revenue Officer,
Karur District.
10. The Revenue Divsional Officer,
Kulithalai Revenue Divisional Officer, Karur District.
11. The Tahsildar (Tenancy),
Krishnarayarpuram Taluk Office,
Kulithalai, Karur District. ... Respondents/
Respondents
Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the order,
dated 12.07.2022, passed in W.P.(MD) No.3568 of 2020, on the file of this Court.
For Appellant : Mr.N.S.Ponniah
For Respondents : Mr.V.Nirmal Kumar
Government Advocate for R8 to R11
Mr.S.Balaji for R5
JUDGMENT
[Judgment of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.]
The attempt of the petitioner to challenge the eviction order passed
by the original authority under Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants
Protection Act, 1955 (for brevity “the Act”), after a lapse of 17 years has been
repelled by the Writ Court on the ground of laches.
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD) No.678 of 2023
2. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant would submit that
such extraordinary delay should be condoned by this Court.
3. Section 6B of the Act makes the original authority – a Court
subordinate to this Court within a meaning of 'Section 115 of the Code of Civil
Procedure, 1908 (Central Act V of 1908)', enabling an aggrieved person to
challenge the order of eviction by way of a revision. Limitation Act, 1963,
provides 90 days limitation for a revision. The present writ petition has been filed
17 years after the passing of the original order of eviction. Hence, we are unable
to fault the Writ Court for having dismissing the same on the ground of laches.
The writ appeal fails and it is accordingly dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the
connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
[R.S.M., J.] [L.V.G., J.]
05.06.2023
NCC : No
Index : No
Internet : Yes
PKN
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD) No.678 of 2023
To:
1. The Special Deputy Collector,(Revenue), O/o.The Special Revenue Deputy Collector Court, Trichy Town.
2. The District Revenue Officer, Karur District.
3. The Revenue Divsional Officer, Kulithalai Revenue Divisional Officer, Karur District.
4. The Tahsildar (Tenancy), Krishnarayarpuram Taluk Office, Kulithalai, Karur District.
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD) No.678 of 2023
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
and L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
PKN
W.A.(MD) No.678 of 2023
05.06.2023
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!