Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8362 Mad
Judgement Date : 14 July, 2023
1 of 4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 14.07.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
Crl.O.P No.15706 of 2023
and Crl.M.P Nos.9787 & 9789 of 2023
S.Vijayalakshmi Petitioners
vs.
A.Pachaiappan Respondent
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, to call for the records relating to STC No.428 of 2023 on
the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Krishnagiri and quash the same.
For Petitioners : Mr.J.Muthukumaran
ORDER
This petition has been filed challenging the proceedings initiated by the
respondent against the petitioner under Sections 138 to 142 of the Negotiable
Instruments Act.
2. The grounds raised by the counsel for the petitioner are all factual in
nature and it requires appreciation of evidence and this Court cannot decide the
same in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure
Code. It is left open to the petitioner to raise all the grounds before the Court https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2 of 4
below and the same shall be considered on its own merits and in accordance
with law. This Court is not inclined to interfere with the proceedings pending
before the Court below.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested this Court to dispense
with the presence of the petitioner. Taking into consideration, the facts and
circumstances of the case, the presence of the petitioner is dispensed with and
she shall be represented by a counsel, who shall cross examine the witnesses on
the same day, they are examined in Chief. The petitioner shall be present
before the Court below at the time of questioning under Section 313 Cr.P.C and
at the time of passing of the final judgement.
4. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a
direction to the Court below to complete the proceedings in STC No.428 of
2023 within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this
order. The trial shall be conducted on a day to day basis in accordance with the
guidelines given by Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in Vinod Kumar Vs State
of Punjab [2015 (1) MLJ (Crl) 288 SC]. If the petitioner adopts any dilatory
tactics, it is open to the trial Court to insist upon the presence of the
petitioner and remand him to custody as per the judgment of the Hon'ble https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3 of 4
Supreme Court in STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. SHAMBHU NATH
SINGH (JT 2001 (4) SC 3191). Consequently, connected miscellaneous
petitions are also closed.
14.07.2023
Index : Yes/No
Internet : Yes/No
Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order
ssr
To
1.The Judicial Magistrate, Krishnagiri.
2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Madras.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4 of 4
N. ANAND VENKATESH,. J.
ssr
Crl.O.P No.15706 of 2023 and Crl.M.P Nos.9787 & 9789 of 2023
14.07.2023 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!