Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7759 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 July, 2023
W.A.No.1405 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.07.2023
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
W.A.No.1405 of 2023
M.A.Sivalingam .. Appellant
Vs
The Joint Commissioner,
Hindu Religious Charitable & Endowment Dept.,
Erode. .. Respondent
Prayer: Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order
10.12.2021 passed in W.P.No.26388 of 2021 by the learned Single
Judge.
For the Appellant : Mr.A.V.Arun
For the Respondent : Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan
Spl. G.P. (HR & CE)
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
We have heard Mr.A.V.Arun, learned counsel for the appellant
and Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan, learned Special Government Pleader (HR
__________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.1405 of 2023
& CE) for the respondent.
2. The appellant assails the order passed by the learned Single
Judge of this court thereby dismissing the writ petition filed by the
appellant.
3. In the writ petition, the appellant, claiming to be de facto
trustee, sought a direction against the respondent not to interfere with
the appellant's right of administration and management of the temple
as a de facto trustee.
4. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant
was never served with the order appointing a Fit Person and, as such,
had not assailed the same.
5. According to learned counsel for the appellant, the appellant,
being the de facto trustee, is entitled to manage the affairs of the
temple. The appellant has already filed O.A.No.151 of 2021 for
framing the scheme enabling the temple to run in a proper manner.
The learned Single Judge has not considered the said aspect.
__________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.1405 of 2023
6. In fact, the appellant is aware that the Fit Person is appointed
more than three years back. In the application filed by the appellant
for framing of the scheme, the appellant himself has made a reference
of the Fit Person being appointed. Once the original order is not
challenged, no question arises of a consequential relief being claimed.
7. In view of that, no error has been committed by the learned
Single Judge in passing the impugned order. The appellant may
prosecute his application filed under Section 64 of the Tamil Nadu
Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959.
With these observations, the writ appeal is dismissed. There will
be no order as to costs.
(S.V.G., CJ.) (P.D.A., J.)
06.07.2023
Index : Yes/No
Neutral Citation : Yes/No
sasi
__________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.1405 of 2023
To:
The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious Charitable & Endowment Dept., Erode.
__________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.1405 of 2023
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND P.D.AUDIKESAVALU,J.
(sasi)
W.A.No.1405 of 2023
06.07.2023
__________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!