Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vishalatchi vs Forest Ranger
2023 Latest Caselaw 735 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 735 Mad
Judgement Date : 19 January, 2023

Madras High Court
Vishalatchi vs Forest Ranger on 19 January, 2023
                                                                           C.M.A.No.1581 of 2015

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED : 19.01.2023

                                                        CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN

                                                C.M.A.No.1581 of 2015
                     1.Vishalatchi
                     2.Minor Santhiya
                     3.Minor Sathish
                     4.Minor Saranya
                     Minors 2 to 4 represented by
                     their mother 1st appellant                            ..Appellants

                                                            Vs.

                     1.Forest Ranger,
                       Perambalur,
                       Thuraimangalam
                       Perambalur Taluk and District.

                     2.The Director,
                       Forest Ranger,
                       No.259, 3rd Floor,
                       D.M.S.Campas
                       Chennai – 600 006.                                  ...Respondents
                     PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the
                     Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the order dated 26.07.2013 made in
                     M.A.C.T.O.P.No.3015 of 2012 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims
                     Tribunal (III Court of Small Causes, Chennai).
                                    For Appellants   : Ms.A.Subadra

                                    For Respondents : Mr.C.Jayaprakash
                                                      Government Pleader

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                C.M.A.No.1581 of 2015




                                                            JUDGMENT

This appeal has been filed by the appellants/claimants seeking

enhancement of compensation under the impugned award dated 26.07.2013

in M.A.C.T.O.P.No.3015 of 2012 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims

Tribunal, (III Court of Small Causes, Chennai).

2.The case in brief, is as follows:

On 19.08.2010, at about 20.30 hours, while the deceased was

standing near the Gudilam Bus Stop, Chennai to Trichy National Highway,

a car bearing Reg.No.TN-46-G-0136 proceedings fromVillupuram to

Ulundurpet, came in a rash and negligent manner and hit the deceased

Ramar. Due to the said impact, the deceased sustained grievous injuries and

died on the spot. One Mr.Mohamed Rafi is the driver of the car. The wife,

sons and daughter of the deceased filed a claim petition before the Tribunal,

claiming a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- as compensation. On consideration of the

materials and evidence available on record, the Tribunal awarded a total

compensation of Rs.9,48,500/- with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum

from the date of petition.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.1581 of 2015

3. Challenging the same, the appellants/claimants have filed the

present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal for enhancement of compensation.

4. The learned counsel for the appellants/claimants has submitted that

the Tribunal has not properly considered and decided the monthly income of

the deceased as per the depositions of P.W.1 and P.W.2 and the documents

marked, while awarding compensation. He further submitted that the

Tribunal ought to add more than 30% as future prospects since at the time of

accident, the deceased was aged about 38 years. He further submitted that

the multiplier adopted by the Tribunal is not proper. It is also submitted that

the Tribunal ought to award more under the heads of 'funeral expenses',

'damages to clothes and articles of the injured', 'mental agony'. He failed to

award under the head of Transport Expenses. Stating so, the learned counsel

prayed for enhancement of compensation.

5.The learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.1581 of 2015

Tribunal has rightly considered the materials and evidence available on

record and has awarded the just, fair and reasonable compensation and the

same does not require any interference at the hands of this Court. Hence, he

prays for dismissal of the appeal.

6. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants and the learned

counsel for the respondents and perused the materials available on record

carefully and meticulously.

7.This is a claimants' appeal seeking enhancement of the

compensation awarded by the Tribunal. Hence, this Court is not inclined to

go into the findings of the Tribunal in respect of negligence as well as the

liability of the respondents to pay compensation.

8.The details of the compensation awarded by the Tribunal are as

follows:

                                              HEADS         AMOUNT (in Rs.)
                                  Loss of dependency            8,77,500/-
                                  (6500x ¼ x 12 x 15)
                                  Loss of Consortium                25,000/-
                                  Love and Affection                40,000/-
                                  Funeral Expenses                   6,000/-

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                      C.M.A.No.1581 of 2015

                                                                   ----------------
                                                     TOTAL           9,48,500/-
                                                                   =========



9.The Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.8,77,500/- towards loss of

dependency by fixing the monthly income of the deceased at Rs.4875/-,

deducting 1/4th of the amount towards personal expenses of the deceased

and adopting the multiplier of 15. The Tribunal has relied upon Ex.R7-Post

Mortem Certificate of the deceased and has taken the age of the deceased as

38 years. Further, taking note of the earning capacity of the deceased and

the economic situation prevailing at that time, after adding 30% for future

prospects of the deceased, the Tribunal fixed the monthly income of the

deceased at Rs.4875/- for calculating the pecuniary loss on account of the

death of the deceased.

10.It is claimed in the claim petition that the deceased was earning a

sum of Rs.15,000/- per month as a mason and that he was the sole earning

member of the family. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the

appellants / claimants that the Tribunal has not properly considered the

evidence of P.W.1 and P.W.2 and the documents marked, while fixing the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.1581 of 2015

monthly income of the deceased at Rs.6,500/-. It is also his specific

submission that the Tribunal ought to have taken 40% while arriving at the

compensation towards for future prospects, instead of 30%.

11.It is seen that the deceased was the entire caretaker of the family

having four dependants. Taking note of the above submissions of the

learned counsel for the appellants / claimants, economic situation prevailing

at that time and also the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of

the considered view that the monthly income of the deceased has to be taken

as Rs.5000/- instead of Rs.4,875/- fixed by the Tribunal. There is no need to

change the multiplier adopted by the Tribunal. Further, the 1/4th deduction

made by the Tribunal also does not require any interference. If Rs.5,000/- is

taken as the monthly income of the deceased, after adding 40% towards

future prospectus of the deceased and 1/4th of the amount is deducted and

the multiplier of 15 is adopted, the loss of dependency works out to

Rs.9,45,000/- ( Rs.5000x40%=2000, 5000+2000=7000 x ¼= 1750, 7000-

1750= 5250, (5250x 12x 15 = 945000). Accordingly, the amount awarded

by the Tribunal towards loss of dependency stands modified to

Rs.9,45,000/-Similarly, it would be appropriate to award a sum of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.1581 of 2015

Rs.40,000/- towards loss of consortium to the wife of the deceased, a sum of

Rs.1,20,000/- towards loss of love and affection to the sons and daughter of

the deceased (Rs.40,000/- x 3), a sum of Rs.15,000/- towards funeral

expenses and a sum of Rs.15,000/- towards Loss of Estate.

12.The details of the modified compensation are as under:

                                              HEADS                AMOUNT
                                                                     (Rs.)

                                  Loss of dependency                 9,45,000/-
                                  (5000+40% x ¼ x 12x 15)
                                  Loss of love and affection         1,20,000/-
                                  Loss of consortium                   40,000/-
                                  Funeral expenses                     15,000/-
                                  Loss of estate                       15,000/-
                                                                   ----------------
                                                    TOTAL...         11,35,000/-
                                                                   =========

13. Thus, the appellants / claimants are entitled to the modified

compensation of Rs.11,35,000/-. It is made clear that for the enhanced

amount of Rs.1,86,500/-, the interest rate of 7.5% shall be calculated from

the date of filing of this appeal.

14.The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is allowed. No costs.

15. The second respondent is directed to deposit the modified

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.1581 of 2015

compensation as ordered above, less the amount if any already deposited,

within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this

judgment. On such deposit being made, the appellants / claimants shall

withdraw the same, on making proper application before the Tribunal.

A.A.NAKKIRAN.,J.

gv

16. Since the compensation amount now awarded is Rs.11,35,000/-, it

is made clear that the claimants have to pay the appropriate Court fee in

order to receive the awarded amount.

                     Index              : Yes/No                                  19.01.2023
                     Internet           : Yes/No

                     gv

                     To

                     1.The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal
                       (III Court of Small Causes, Chennai).

                     2.The Section Officer,
                       VR Section,
                       Madras High Court.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                        C.M.A.No.1581 of 2015




                                  C.M.A.No.1581 of 2015




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter