Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nagajothi vs M.Ramuthai
2023 Latest Caselaw 554 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 554 Mad
Judgement Date : 10 January, 2023

Madras High Court
Nagajothi vs M.Ramuthai on 10 January, 2023
                                                                            C.R.P PD(MD)No.2020 of 2022


                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                     Dated: 10.01.2023

                                                         CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

                                              C.R.P(MD)No.2020 of 2022

                    Nagajothi                                                      ... Petitioner
                                                               Vs

                    1.M.Ramuthai
                    2.M.Suriya
                    3.Sundareshan
                    4.Parvatharaj
                    5.S.Ramkumar
                    6.K.Aathilingam
                    7.S.Lakshmanakumar                                            ... Respondents

                    PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the
                    Constitution of India, to set aside the order of return dated 07.09.2022 by
                    the       Principal   District    Judge,        Theni   in    unnumbered        filing
                    No.OS/10847/2022 CNR No.TNTH010047702022, on the file of the
                    Principal District Judge, Theni and direct the learned Judge to take the
                    suit on file.
                                          For Petitioner              : Mr.D.Malaichamy
                                          For Respondents             : No appearance

                    1/8




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                    C.R.P PD(MD)No.2020 of 2022



                                                     ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition is filed as against the order of

return dated 07.09.2022 by the learned Principal District Judge, Theni in

unnumbered filing No.OS/10847/2022 CNR No. TNTH010047702022,

dated 07.09.2022.

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits

that the petitioner/plaintiff has filed the above suit before the Principal

District Court, Theni as against the respondents herein, for the relief of

partition for her share in the joint family property and also for permanent

injunction. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the value

of suit property is Rs.17,62,700/-. The value of plaintiff's ¼ share is Rs.

4,49,475/-. The court fee was paid under Section 37 (2) of Tamil Nadu

Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act, 1955 for Rs.5,000/-. The learned

District Judge, Theni returned the plaint for certain defects including a

query of jurisdiction as per the share value of the property on 24.08.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P PD(MD)No.2020 of 2022

and the same was re-presented by the plaintiff on 30.08.2022 after

compliance of the defects. With regard to the jurisdiction, the plaintiff

has stated that as per Section 37(2) of Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suit

Valuation Act, the value of the plaintiff's share or market value of the suit

property has no relevance and payment of court fee alone has to be

considered. In order to substantiate his contention, the learned counsel

has relied upon the citations 2013 (2) CTC 342 and 1995 MLJ NOC 30.

Thereafter, on 07.09.2022, the plaint was once again returned with the

following endorsement:-

''To state how this Court has got pecuniary jurisdiction of share value. As per Section 12 of the Tamil Nadu Civil Court Laws to try a suit to the value of Rs.10,00,000/- is having jurisdiction of Sub Court. Hence, to be presented before the appropriate Court. Judgment relied on 2013 (2) CTC 288.''

Aggrieved over the same, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P PD(MD)No.2020 of 2022

3. The learned counsel appearing for petitioner projected that

as per the amended act of Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act,

the total market value of suit property alone has to be reckoned for the

purpose of deciding the court fees and as per section 53 of Tamil Nadu

Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act, where the fee payable is at a fixed

rate the value for the purpose of determining the jurisdiction of courts

shall be the market value of the suit property. Therefore, the Court has

erroneously returned the papers.

4. The jurisdiction of District Judge and Subordinate Judge is

defined under Section 12 of the Tamil Nadu Civil Courts Act, 1873 as

follows: -

12. Jurisdiction of District Judge or Subordinate Judge in original suits.-[The jurisdiction of a District Judge extends, subject to the rules contained in the Code of Civil Procedure, to all original suits and proceedings of a civil nature, of which the amount of value of the subject matter exceeds five lakh rupees.

The jurisdiction of a Subordinate Judge extends,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P PD(MD)No.2020 of 2022

subject to the rules contained in the Code of Civil Procedure, to all like original suits and proceedings, of which the amount or value of the subject-matter exceeds one lakh rupees, but does not exceed five lakh rupees.]

It is clear from Section 12 of the Tamil Nadu Civil Courts Act, 1873 that

only suits exceeding the value of Rs.5 lakhs can be admitted under the

District Judge and suits under the value of Rs.5 lakhs has to be admitted

by the Subordinate Judge. Here, the plaintiff’s share is only

Rs.4,40,675/- which comes only under the jurisdiction of the

Subordinate Court.

5. This Court in G. Lokanayaki v. Venkatraj, 2013 (2) CTC 288, has held that,

“7. As rightly contended by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner, the Sub-Court has jurisdiction as per Section 12 of Tamil Nadu Civil Court Laws, to try a Suit to the value of Rs. 10,00,000/-. The mistake committed by the District Court is that the District Court has taken the entire property value to decide the pecuniary jurisdiction. It is not correct. The

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P PD(MD)No.2020 of 2022

Plaintiff has claimed only Rs. 1,76,947/- as her share in the joint family property. Hence, the Suit value is Rs. 1,76,947/- as per Section 37(1) of the Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and Suit Valuation Act. Section 37(1) of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act is extracted in this regard.“

The entire value of suit property in the present case is Rs. 17,62,700/-

and the plaintiff claims only 1/4th of suit property, which is

Rs. 4,49,475/-. Thereby, relying on the above ratio, the entire property

value cannot be taken into account to consider the pecuniary jurisdiction,

but only the share of the plaintiff i.e Rs. 4,40,675/- alone has to be

considered.

6. In view of the above, this Civil Revision Petition is

dismissed. No costs. Registry is directed to return the original plaint to

the petitioner after getting acknowledgment.

10.01.2023

Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. vrn

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P PD(MD)No.2020 of 2022

To The Principal District Court, Theni

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P PD(MD)No.2020 of 2022

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

vrn

C.R.P(MD)No.2020 of 2022

10.01.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter