Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 481 Mad
Judgement Date : 9 January, 2023
C.M.A.No.2831 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09.01.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
C.M.A.No.2831 of 2022
and C.M.P.No.22068 of 2022
The Chief Litigation Manager
Liberty of General Insurance Company Limited
10th Floor, Tower A Peninsula Business Park
Ganapath Rao, Kadam Marg Lower Parel
Mumbai – 400 013 .. Appellant
Versus
1.Gubendiran
2.Sureskumar .. Respondents
Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicle
Act, 1988 against the Judgment and Decree dated 25.07.2022 passed in
M.C.O.P.No.201/2016 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in the
Court of the Special Subordinate Court, Tiruvannamalai.
For Appellant : Mrs.M.B.Raghavan
for M.B.Gopalan Associates
For Respondents : Mr.S.P.Yuvaraj
JUDGMENT
The Insurance Company is the appellant herein challenging the award
passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in the Court of the Special
Subordinate Court, Tiruvannamalai in M.C.O.P.No.201/2016 on the ground of
liability.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2831 of 2022
2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant, the second respondent
herein filed the above M.C.O.P claiming compensation for the grevious injury
suffered by him in the road accident on 03.09.2015, wherein, the said lorry was
insured with the appellant insurance company. The Tribunal has awarded a sum
of Rs.4,83,610/- as compensation. Challenging the same, the Appellant
Insurance Company has filed this appeal.
3. The learned counsel for the appellant would contend that as per Ex.P1,
he is a loadman traveled in the lorry to bring marble stones and the lorry met
with accident. Further, he would contend that the if he is a loadman, he is
covered, however, he was working as a mason in a private company.
4. After going through the overall documentary evidences and the
findings rendered by the Tribunal below, the Tribunal had rightly held that
since the petitioner was traveling in the vehicle as a loadman and as per Clause
IMT 28 issue under Section 7 of the Indian Motor Tariff, he is covered and the
Insurance Company also premium. Hence, the Insurance Company is jointly
and severally liable to pay the compensation. Such findings of the Tribunal on
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2831 of 2022
consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and overall
documentary documentary evidence does not suffer from any irregularities or
illegalities.
5. Therefore, this Court is of the view that the impugned order requires
no interference by this Court. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is
liable to be dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous
petition is closed.
09.01.2023
Index : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order dhk
To
The Presiding Officer, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in the Court of the Special Subordinate Court Tiruvannamalai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2831 of 2022
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN.J,
dhk
C.M.A.No.2831 of 2022
09.01.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!