Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 15977 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 December, 2023
S.A.No.971 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.12.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
Second Appeal No.971 of 2012
and C.M.P.No.15925 of 2017
Sivasubramanian ... Appellant
Versus
1.Rajeswari
2.Angu Bhuvaneswari
3.Alamelumanga
4.Sivagami
5.Anguthai
6.Angu Raja Rajarajeswari
7.Periyanayagam
8.Eswaramurthy
9.Venkatesan
10.Maheswaran
... Respondents
Prayer: The Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of
Civil Procedure, against the Judgment and Decree made in A.S.No.23 of
2011, dated 20.02.2012, on the file of the District Judge, Nagapattinanm
reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.74 of 2008 dated
08.12.2010
For Appellant : Mr.--Gopalakrishnan
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.No.971 of 2012
For R1 & R2 : Mr.A.Muthu kumar
For R3 to R6 : Mr.B.Jawahar
For R7 to R10 : Mr.P.Srividhya
JUDGMENT
Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, Mr.A.Muthu
kumar, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. A.Muthu kumar, learned
learned counsel for the first respondent, Mr.B.Jawahar, learned counsel for
the respondents 3 to 6 and Mr.P.Srividhya, learned counsel for the
respondents 7 to 10 submitted that the appellant have settled the dispute
amicably between themselves by entering into a joint memo of compromise,
today. The learned counsel for the respondent further submitted that the
appellant is bed-ridden and permission is granted by this Court to his wife
and daughter to represent the appellant on his behalf and the same is also
recorded. Hence, according to them, this appeal suit may be disposed of in
terms of the said joint memo of compromise.
2. The joint memo of compromise dated 08.12.2023 has been
produced before this Court, from a perusal of which, it is seen that that the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
same has been signed by the appellant and the respondents and their
respective counsel as well.
3. The memo of compromise dated 08.12.2023 signed by the
respective parties and their respective counsel is taken on record. In the light
of the compromise memo, this Second Appeal is dismissed as settled out of
Court. The compromise memo shall form part of the order.
4. The Registry is directed to furnish the certified copy of the order
within two weeks and directed to send back the trial records immediately
without any delay. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is
closed. No cost.
08.12.2023 vsn Index:Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No
To
1. The District Judge, Nagapattinanm
2. The Subordinate Court, Tiruppur.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI,J.
vsn
08.12.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!