Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9931 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 August, 2023
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 08.08.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRVARTHY
W.A(MD)NO.1278 OF 2023
and
C.M.P(MD)No.9597 of 2023
The Management of Tamil Nadu State
Transport Corporation(Madurai)Limited,
Dindigul Region,
represented by its General Manager,
Dindigu. :Appellant/Respondent
.vs.
S.Venugopal : Respondent/Petitioner
PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent
praying this Court to set aside the order passed by this Court in
W.P(MD)No.19741 of 2018, dated 30.01.2020.
For Appellant :Mr.J.Senthil Kumaraiah
JUDGMENT
********* [Judgment of the Court was made by S.S.SUNDAR,J.]
This Writ Appeal is directed against the order passed by the
learned Single Judge in W.P(MD)No.19741 of 2018, dated
30.01.2020, allowing the Writ Petition filed by the respondent/Writ
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Petitioner for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the
respondent therein to refund the amount of Rs.2,04,360/-
recovered from the terminal benefits of the Petitioner in the name of
recovery towards increment cut together with 18% interest per
annum.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the Writ
appeal is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.
3.It is not in dispute that the Writ Petitioner retired from
service on 30.06.2013. About 1 ½ years before his date of
retirement, a punishment was imposed on him to have a cut in
increment for five years with cumulative effect. Even though the
Writ Petitioner retired from service, during the currency of
punishment, the appellant recovered a sum of Rs.2,04,360/- from
the terminal benefits of the Writ Petitioner towards the value of
uneffected period of punishment with interest at the rate of 18%
pa.The Writ Petition was allowed by the learned Single Judge of this
Court, following the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in
W.A(MD)No.465 of 2017, dated 30.6.2017. Similar issue came
up for consideration before the Division Bench and the Division
Bench has held that the recovery made from the terminal benefits
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
of an employee towards the value of uneffected period of
punishment, is not permissible. The principles followed by the
Division Bench has already been followed by this Court in serveral
judgments.This Court is also convinced that the Writ Petitioner is
entitled to the relief by applying the law laid down by the Division
Bench of this Court in the said judgment. This Court has no reasons
to take a different view in the present Writ Appeal and hence, this
Court finds no merit in the Writ Appeal.
4.Accordingly, the Writ Appeal Stands dismissed. No costs.
Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
[S.S.S.R.,J.] [D.B.C.,J.]
08.08.2023
Index:Yes/No
Internet:Yes/No
NCC:Yes/No
vsn
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.S.SUNDAR, J.
AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
vsn
JUDGMENT MADE IN W.A(MD)NO.1278 OF 2023 and C.M.P(MD)No.9597 of 2023
08.08.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!