Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

R. Venkatakrishnan vs Sridharan
2023 Latest Caselaw 9663 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9663 Mad
Judgement Date : 4 August, 2023

Madras High Court
R. Venkatakrishnan vs Sridharan on 4 August, 2023
                                                          1                          TOS No.36 of 2022

                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS


                                                       DATED : 04.08.2023


                                                              CORAM:
                                    THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN


                                                       T.O.S.No.36 of 2022


                     R. Venkatakrishnan                                                    ...Plaintiff
                                                          Vs.
                     Sridharan                                                            ...Defendant


                     Prayer:- This Suit filed under Sections 222 and 276 of the Indian
                     Succession Act XXXIX of 1925 for grant of Probate.


                                       For Plaintiff               : Mr.M Ganesh
                                       For Defendant               : No Appearance
                                                           *****
                                                          JUDGMENT

This Testamentary Original Suit has been filed, under Sections 232

and 276 of the Indian Succession Act and Order 25 Rule 5 of the Original

Side Rules, to grant of Probate.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

2. The case of the Plaintiff, in a nutshell, as set out, in the plaint is as

follows:-

The deceased Testator Mr.S.Narayanan is the Parental Uncle of the

plaintiff/petitioner. The deceased had no issues and his wife and parents

predeceased him. The Testator had executed a Will dated 26.02.2017 as his

last Will appointing the plaintiff/petitioner as a sole executor. The amount of

assets, which is likely come into the hands of the Plaintiff does not exceed in

the aggregate sum of Rs.63,70,055/- and the net amount of the said assets,

after deducing all the items, which the Plaintiff, is by law allowed to deduct,

is only of the value of Rs.63,60,055/-. The Plaintiff undertakes to duly

administer the property and the credits of the said deceased Testator

Mr.S.Narayanan, in any way concerning his Will, by paying first his debts

and then, the legacies therein bequeathed so far as the assets will extend and

to make a full and true inventory thereof and exhibit the same in the Court,

within six months from the date of grant of Probate, with the Will annexed

to the Plaintiff and also to render a true account of the said property and

credits within one year from the said date. No application has been made to

any District Court or delegate or to any other High Court for probate or any

Will of the said deceased or Letters of Administration with or without the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Will annexed to his properties and credits. Hence, this Testamentary

Original Suit suit has been filed, seeking the reliefs, as stated above.

3.Since no written statement has been filed by the defendant, the case

is considered as un-defendant case. The plaintiff examined himself as PW1

and examined the other witnesses, PW2 and PW3 who are the attesting

witnesses to the Will and had produced Exs.P1 to P3, in order to substantiate

his case.

4. This Court heard the submissions of the learned counsel on the

plaintiff's side. There is no representation on the side of the defendant.

5. The learned counsel for the Plaintiff has submitted that the

deceased Testator Mr.S.Narayanan is the Parental Uncle of the

plaintiff/petitioner. The deceased had no issues and his wife and parents

predeceased him. The Testator had executed a Will dated 26.02.2017 as his

last Will and Testament in respect of his properties described in the schedule

attached herewith in the presence of the following two witnesses by

appointing the plaintiff/petitioner as the sole executor.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

1) Mrs. N. Nirmala W/o.V. Narayana Moorthy,

2) Mr.Ramalingam S/o. Thiruvalarchettiyar.

6.It has been further submitted that the property mentioned in Item

No.2 of Schedule I of the Will dated 26.02.2017 ie. all that piece and parcel

of land bearing Housing Plot No.408 & 409 in Sri Ram Nagar Layout,

measuring an extent of 4800 Sq.ft comprised in S.No.285/1 and 285/2,

situated at Nemili Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, admeasuring 4800 Sq.ft of

land thereon and situate within the Registration District of Chengalpet and

Sub Registration District of Sriperumbudur was acquired by the Government

for Bangalore-Chennai Express Way Project and a compensation of

Rs.37,66,742/- was awarded to late Mr.Narayanan by the Competent

Authority and Special District Revenue Officer (LA), National Highways,

Kancheepuram by her proceedings made in Rc.No.16/2015/NH/BCE/Unit-

IV dated 27.01.2020. Therefore, the above mentioned property is excluded

and not mentioned in the schedule hereunder.

7. This Court considered the submissions of the learned counsel on

the side of the plaintiff and also perused the materials available on record.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

8. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, plaint

and the oral and documentary evidence, viz. Ex.P1-Will, Ex.P2-Land

Acquisition Proceedings in respect of Item No.2 of Schedule 1 of Will and

Ex.P3- Death Certificate, and PW.1 to P.W.3, it is seen that the testator had

no issues and his wife and parents predeceased him. The Testator is the

Parental Uncle of the plaintiff. When the evidence of the attesting witness

P.W.2 and P.W.3 is perused, it would speak to the effect that they were

present on the day of execution of the Ex.P1-Will on 26.02.2017 and they

saw the testator, putting his signature in the Will and the testator saw them

putting their signatures as witnesses and thereby he has also spoken about

the attestation of the document, in accordance with law. The evidence of

P.W.2 and P.W.3 would also go to show that the testator was in a sound and

disposing state of mind and was in a good health, at the time of execution of

Ex.P1 Will. The testamentary jurisdiction is invoked only for the purpose of

deciding the proof of the Will in order to grant of probate. In the event of

absent on the side of the defendant during the hearing and written statement

has not been filed on his side, this Court is of the view that the Plaintiff has

established that he is entitled to grant of Probate.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

A.A. NAKKIRAN., J.

Lbm

9. The Plaintiff is directed to render true and correct accounts once in

a year.

10.In the result, this TOS is decreed as prayed. Issue probate in favour

of the Plaintiff in respect of the Will executed by the deceased S.Narayanan.

No costs.

04.08.2023 Lbm

1. List of Witnesses examined on the side of the plaintiff:-

1.P.W.1 - Mr. R. Venkatakrishnan

2.P.W.2- Mrs. N. Nirmala

3.P.W.3-Mr. T. Ramalingam

2. List of Exhibits marked on the side of the plaintiff:-

1.Ex.P1 -Will

2. Ex.P2- Land Acquisition proceedings in respect of Item No.2 of Schedule 1 of Will

3.Ex.P3- Death Certificate T.O.S.No.36 of 2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter