Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rajam Industries Private Ltd vs Lakshmi Industries
2023 Latest Caselaw 9475 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9475 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 August, 2023

Madras High Court
Rajam Industries Private Ltd vs Lakshmi Industries on 2 August, 2023
                                                                          C.S.No.460 of 2017


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                                               DATED: 02.08.2023
                                                   CORAM
                        THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
                                               C.S.No.460 of 2017

                     Rajam Industries Private Ltd
                     2/146 , Mount Poonamallee Road,
                     Kattupakkam, Chennai - 600 056
                     and having its Administrative Office at
                     No.14, Azeez Nagar, 2nd Street,
                     Kodambakkam, Chennai - 600 024.                       ... Plaintiff
                                                     -vs-

                     Lakshmi Industries
                     No.512, Chennai Bye Pass Road,
                     Pappanpattu Village ,Near Tollgate,
                     Panayapuram post ,Vikravandi(Taluk) ,
                     Villupuram District-605 652 .                       ... Defendant


                     PRAYER: Plaint filed under Order IV Rule 1 O.S.Rules Read With

                     Order VII Rule 1 of CPC Along with Sections 27, 28 and 29, 134 and

                     135 of the Trademarks Act, 1999 and Sections 51, 55 and 62 of the

                     Copyright Act, 1957, pleased to




                     1/8


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                 C.S.No.460 of 2017


                                  (a) Granting Permanent Injunction restraining the Defendant,

                     their men, Servants , agents, Directors , Proprietors, managers,

                     distributors, wholesalers, retailers, licensees, representatives or any

                     one claiming through it from in any manner infringing the Plaintiff's

                     registered Trade Mark "OORVASI" (device), wherein the mark

                     OORVASI is prominent and distinctive element ,by using the

                     identical and offending trade mark "OORMIKA" or any other mark

                     or marks which are in anyway identical with and /or deceptively

                     similar to and / or a colorable imitation of the plaintiff's registered

                     Trademark, by manufacturing or selling or advertising or using the

                     same in any other manner whatsoever;

                                  (b) Granting permanent injunction restraining the Defendant,

                     their men, servants, agents, directors, proprietors, managers,

                     distributors, wholesalers, retailers, licensees, representatives or any

                     one claiming through it from in any manner infringing the Plaintiff's

                     copyright in the artistic work in OORVASI labels as found in

                     Annexure A to the plaint by using the offending OORMIKA label as



                     2/8


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                 C.S.No.460 of 2017


                     found in Annexure B to the plaint or any other artistic work, which is

                     in anyway identical with and / or deceptively similar to and / or a

                     colorable imitation of the Plaintiff's artistic work, by manufacturing

                     or selling or offering for sale or advertising or using the same in any

                     other manner whatsoever;

                                  (c) Granting permanent injunction restraining the Defendant,

                     their men, servants, agents, directors, proprietors, managers,

                     distributors, wholesalers, retailers, licensees, representatives or any

                     one claiming through it from in any manner passing off its products

                     under the offending Trademark "OORMIKA" and a almost identical

                     / deceptively similar packaging label as and for the Plaintiff's

                     products under the prior adopted trademark "OORVASI" and prior

                     adopted and continuously used OORVASI packaging label and / or

                     in any other manner whatsoever;

                                  (d) Directing the Defendant to render a true and faithful

                     account of the profits earned by the Defendant through the sale of its

                     products, including the products bearing the offending Trademark



                     3/8


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                       C.S.No.460 of 2017


                     "OORMIKA" and its imitative packaging label and direct payment of

                     such profits to the Plaintiff for the acts of infringement and passing

                     off committed by the Defendant;

                                  (e) Directing the Defendant to surrender to the Plaintiff for

                     destruction, the entire stock of unused offending labels along with

                     prints, dies, blocks, moulds, plates, screen prints, packing and

                     advertising material bearing the offending Trademark "OORMIKA"

                     and the imitative packaging label.

                                  (f) Directing the Defendant to pay to the Plaintiff the cost of the

                     suit.

                                  For Plaintiff      : Mr.Rajesh Ramanathan

                                  For Defendant      : Mr.K.K.Senthil, Senior Advocate
                                                       for M/s.Gnanadesekan Law Associates
                                                            **********

                                                         JUDGMENT

The suit was filed seeking relief in respect of alleged

infringement and passing off in relation to the plaintiff's registered

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S.No.460 of 2017

Trademark "OORVASI" by use of the impugned mark "OORMIKA"

or any mark deceptively similar thereto.

2. At the hearing on 11.07.2023, learned senior counsel for the

defendant submitted that the defendant discontinued operations in

the wake of the Covid - 19 pandemic and stopped using the mark

"OORMIKA". It was further submitted that an affidavit containing

requisite undertakings would be filed. Such affidavit was filed

today.

3. In the affidavit, the defendant has stated and undertaken as

under:

"3. It is respectively submitted that due to Covid - 19 pandemic and due to the financial condition, the defendant Industry, namely Lakshmi Industries No.512, Chennai Bye Pass Road, Pappanpattu Village, Near Tollgate, Panayapuram Post, Vikravandi Taluk, Villupuram District - 605 652, was not in

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S.No.460 of 2017

operation. Further the machinery and equipment's which are all used for manufacturing activities of OORMIKA brand, detergent cake & powder were already sold.

4. It is respectively submitted that the defendant namely Lakshmi Industries is already closed and we undertake that we will not manufacture OORMIKA brand, detergent cake & powder at any cost in future and we further undertake that we will not use their label in the name of OORMIKA or any other similar names, for the above purpose.

5. It is respectively submitted that on 10.07.2023 this defendant-initiated proceedings for cancellation of the Trade Mark registration for the Trade Mark name of OORMIKA bearing Registered No.3461998 dated 02.08.2016.

6. It is respectively submitted that this defendant once again undertake that the defendant will not use the OORMIKA brand or any other similar brand for the manufacturing of detergent cake & powder at any circumstances."

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S.No.460 of 2017

4. In view of the said undertakings, no adjudication is

necessary and the suit may be decreed in terms thereof. Accordingly,

C.S.No.460 of 2017 is decreed in terms of undertakings set out above

and contained in the affidavit dated 22.07.2023, which was affirmed

by Mr.K.Babu, Partner of the defendant. The said affidavit shall form

an integral part of the decree. In the circumstances, the parties shall

bear their respective costs.

02.08.2023 rna Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S.No.460 of 2017

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J

rna

C.S.No.460 of 2017

02.08.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter