Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Principal Secretary & vs Rajalakshmi
2023 Latest Caselaw 10869 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10869 Mad
Judgement Date : 21 August, 2023

Madras High Court
The Principal Secretary & vs Rajalakshmi on 21 August, 2023
                                                                          W.A. No.916 of 2020

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  Dated 21.08.2023

                                                       CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR
                                                      and
                                     THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI

                                                W.A. No.916 of 2020
                                             and CMP.No.11301 of 2019

                     1. The Principal Secretary &
                        Commissioner of Land Administration,
                        Chepauk, Chennai 600 005.
                     2. The Settlement Officer,
                        Office of the Settlement Officer,
                        Chepauk, Chennai 600 005.
                     3. Assistant Settlement Officer - South,
                        Office of the Settlement Officer,
                        Chepauk, Chennai 600 005.
                     4. The Collector,
                        Madurai District, Madurai.
                     5. The District Revenue Officer,
                        Madurai District, Madurai.                            .. Appellant
                                                          Vs.
                     Tmt.Ammaniammal (deceased)
                     1. Rajalakshmi
                     2. Ramachandran
                     [petitioners 2 & 3-substituted as legal heirs
                       in the place of deceased petitioner as per order
                       dated 10.01.2012 in MP.No.1 of 2012
                       in WP.No.27887 of 2010]                             .. Respondents

                     Page No.1 / 5


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                      W.A. No.916 of 2020




                                  Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the
                     order dated 26.07.2019 made in WP.No.27887 of 2010 passed by the
                     learned Single Judge of this Court.

                                              For appellants    : Mr.U.M.Ravichandran, Spl.G.P.

                                              For respondents
                                                for R1          : No Appearance
                                                for R2          : died

                                                         JUDGMENT

(The Judgment of the Court was delivered by D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J)

This Writ Appeal has been filed by the Department challenging the

direction issued by the Writ Court in WP.No.27887 of 2010 dated

26.07.2019.

2. According to the appellants, the respondents herein filed Writ

Petition before this Court in WP.No.27887 of 2010, challenging the

proceedings of the Principal Secretary and Commissioner of Land

Administration, Chepauk Chennai, dated 01.10.2020 and cause correction

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A. No.916 of 2020

insofar as survey No.31/2 at Ulaganeri Village, North Taluk, Madurai

District and issue patta in favour of the petitioner in respect of the above

property.

3. The above Writ Petition was disposed of with a direction to

challenge the proceedings issued by the Assistant Settlement Officer dated

13.12.1955. Subsequently, the respondents 1 and 2 herein filed another Writ

Petition in WP.No.18896 of 2013 challenging the order passed by the

Assistant Settlement Officer dated 13.12.1955 before this Court. Upon

hearing the parties concerned, a detailed order has been passed dismissing

the Writ Petition. According to the learned Special Government Pleader

appearing for the appellants, as no appeal has been preferred, the said order

has become final.

4. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

5. It is to be seen that as per the direction issued in the impugned

order, the respondents herein already filed Writ Petition WP.No.18592 of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A. No.916 of 2020

2013, which came to be dismissed. Hence, nothing survives for adjudication

in this appeal. Therefore, the Writ Appeal is dismissed. No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.




                                                                       [D.K.K., J] [P.B.B., J.]
                                                                           21.08.2023
                     Speaking order: Yes/No
                     Index         : Yes/No
                     pvs







https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A. No.916 of 2020

D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.

and P.B.BALAJI, J.

pvs

W.A. No.916 of 2020

21.08.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter