Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10585 Mad
Judgement Date : 17 August, 2023
Crl.R.C.No.633 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 17.08.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA
Crl.R.C.No.633 of 2023
Nirmala ... Petitioner
Vs.
State Rep. by
The Inspector of Police,
D-5, Pallipattu Police Station,
Thiruvallur District.
(Crime No.149 of 2022) ... Respondent
Prayer : Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 r/w. 401 of
Criminal Procedure Code to set aside the order dated 04.03.2023 made in
Crl.M.P.No.1116/2023 on the file of Principal Special Court Under EC &
NDPS Act Chennai.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Arunkumar
For Respondent : Mr.R.Vinothraja, GA (Crl. Side)
ORDER
Challenging the orders dated 04.03.2023 in
Crl.M.P.No.1116/2023 passed by the learned Principal Special Judge
under EC & NDPS Act, Chennai, the present revision is filed.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.No.633 of 2023
2. The revision petitioner filed a petition in
Crl.M.P.No.1116/2023 in C.C.No.01/2023 on the file of the above said
Court under Sections 451 & 457 Cr.P.C seeking return of two wheeler
Honda Activa 4G BS IV bearing Reg No.TN 13-J-2162 brown colour
which was seized by the Inspector of Police, D-5, Pallipattu Police
Station, Thiruvallur District in Crime No.149/2022 for the offence
punishable under Sections 8(c) r/w.20(b)(ii)(B) of NDPS Act and 328
IPC.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the revision petitioner is
the mother of the first accused. A1 and A2 were found in illegal
possession of 5.500 Kgs of Ganja on 11.11.2022 by the respondent
police. The contraband was seized from them which was kept in the two
wheeler, namely, Honda Activa 4G BS IV bearing Reg No.TN 13-J-2162.
Both of them were remanded to judicial custody on the same day. The
seized vehicle along with the contraband was produced before the
Principal Special Court under EC & NDPS Act in B.No.395/2022 dated
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.No.633 of 2023
18.11.2022. Therefore, the present revision petitioner filed a petition for
return of the vehicle.
4. The learned Principal Special Judge under EC & NDPS Act
vide her orders dated 04.03.2022 dismissed the petition, challenging
which, this criminal revision is filed.
5. Heard, Mr.V.Arunkumar, learned counsel for the revision
petitioner and Mr.R.Vinothraja, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
learned counsel for the respondent.
6. Mr.R.Vinothraja, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
contended that the investigation in the instant case is completed and that
final report was also filed before the concerned Court in C.C.No.1/2023.
He would further contend that there are 13 cases against the present
accused for the alleged offences of theft and robbery and that the present
petitioner is a habitual offender. Therefore, he would submit that the two
wheeler of the petitioner may not be returned and prayed for dismissal of
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.No.633 of 2023
this revision.
7. Mr.V.Arunkumar, learned counsel for the revision petitioner
contended that out of 13 cases, the accused was acquitted in 9 cases. He
also produced copies of the judgments passed in all these cases. He
further contended that if the seized vehicle is kept in an open space, the
value of the vehicle would diminish over a period of time and hence, he
prayed for return of the same.
8. It is relevant to refer to a decision of the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai and others Vs. State of Gujarat
reported in (2002) 10 SCC 283 in which it was held thus :
“Vehicles “In our view, whatever be the situation, it is of no use to keep such seized vehicles at the police stations for a long period. It is for the Magistrate to pass appropriate orders immediately by taking appropriate bond and guarantee as well as security for return of the said vehicles, if required at any point of time. This can be done pending
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.No.633 of 2023
hearing of applications for return of such vehicles.
In case where the vehicle is not claimed by the accused, owner, or the insurance company or by third person, then such vehicle may be ordered to be auctioned by the Court. If the said vehicle is insured with the insurance company, then insuance company be informed by the Court to take possession of the vehicle, which is not claimed by the owner or a third person. If insurance Company fails to take possession the vehicles may be sold as per the direction of the Court. The Court would pass such order within a period of six months from the date of production of the said vehicle before the Court. In any case, before handing over possession of such vehicles, appropriate photographs of the said vehicle should be taken and detailed panchanama should be prepared.”
9. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the
fact that the revision petitioner who is the mother of the accused is not
involved in any of the offences, this Court is inclined to allow this
revision. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is allowed and the
impugned order dated 04.03.2023 in Crl.M.P.No.1116/2023 passed by
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.No.633 of 2023
the learned Principal Special Judge, Special Court under EC & NDPS
Act, Chennai is set aside. Learned Principal Special Judge is directed to
return the two wheeler of the petitioner subject to the following conditions
:
i) the petitioner shall prove the ownership of the vehicle by producing R.C.Book and other relevant records;
ii) the R.C.Book shall be deposited in the Court and the Court shall issue a certificate in this regard.
iii) the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/-
(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) before the learned Principal Special Judge, Special Court under EC & NDPS Act, Chennai.
iv) the Court may prepare a panchanama in Judicial Form No.82 with regard to the vehicle bearing Reg.No.TN13-J-2162 and such panchanama can be used in evidence.
v) the Court shall take photograph of the vehicle bearing Reg.No.TN13-J-2162 and certify the same under Section 65B of the Central Act 1 of 1972 and such photographs may be used as secondary evidence.
vi) the petitioner shall not alienate or encumber the vehicle in any manner whatsoever;
vii)the petitioner shall give an undertaking that she would not use the vehicle for any illegal activities in future,
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.No.633 of 2023
viii) the petitioner shall also produce the vehicle as and when required by the court below and by the respondent police.
17.08.2023
Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking/Non-Speaking order mtl
To
1.The Principal Special Judge for NDPS Act, Chennai.
2.The Inspector of Police, D-5, Pallipattu Police Station, Thiruvallur District.
R. HEMALATHA, J.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.No.633 of 2023
mtl
Crl.R.C.No.633 of 2023
17.08.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!