Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

S.Paramasivam vs Government Of Tamil Nadu
2023 Latest Caselaw 10106 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10106 Mad
Judgement Date : 10 August, 2023

Madras High Court
S.Paramasivam vs Government Of Tamil Nadu on 10 August, 2023
                                                                                 W.P.No.23409 of 2023

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED : 10.08.2023

                                                     CORAM :

                            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR

                                              W.P.No.23409 of 2023

                    S.Paramasivam                                                 ... Petitioner

                                                         Vs.

                    1.Government of Tamil Nadu,
                      Represented by its Additional Chief Secretary,
                      Environment and Forest Department,
                      Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

                    2.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests,
                      (Head of Forest Force)
                      Velachery Main Road, Guindy,
                      Chennai – 600 032.                                          ... Respondents

                    Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                    for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the entire
                    records which culminated in issuing G.O.(2D)No.76, Environment,
                    Climate Change and Forests (FR.2ii) Department, dated 05.04.2023, on
                    the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same and consequently to direct
                    the respondents to regularize the service of petitioner in the cadre of Forest
                    Watcher for the purpose of getting minimum pension / family pension on
                    par with juniors, namely P.Karuppiah S.No. 4608, with effect from
                    24.01.1995 in the light of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.15561
                    of 2006 dated 10.03.2008, W.A.No.690 of 2008 dated 13.10.2009,
                    W.P.No.23374 of 2008 dated 30.10.2009, W.A.No.607 of 2010 dated
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis


                    Page 1 of 8
                                                                                  W.P.No.23409 of 2023

                    29.03.2010 and proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 07.01.2011 and
                    order in W.P.No.19020 of 2021 dated 09.09.2021 within a time limit that
                    may be fixed by this Court.



                                  For Petitioner     : Mr.S.Mani

                                  For Respondents    : Mr.S.Arumugam
                                                       Government Advocate


                                                       ORDER

This writ petition has been filed to call for the entire records

which culminated in issuing G.O.(2D)No.76, Environment, Climate

Change and Forests (FR.2ii) Department, dated 05.04.2023, on the file of

the 1st respondent and quash the same and consequently to direct the

respondents to regularize the service of petitioner in the cadre of Forest

Watcher for the purpose of getting minimum pension / family pension on

par with juniors, namely P.Karuppiah S.No. 4608, with effect from

24.01.1995 in the light of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.15561

of 2006 dated 10.03.2008, W.A.No.690 of 2008 dated 13.10.2009,

W.P.No.23374 of 2008 dated 30.10.2009, W.A.No.607 of 2010 dated

29.03.2010 and proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 07.01.2011 and

order in W.P.No.19020 of 2021 dated 09.09.2021 within a time limit that

may be fixed by this Court.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.23409 of 2023

2.The case of the petitioner is that he joined the Forest

Department as Plot Watcher on daily wage basis on 01.05.1982 and

subsequently, his services as Plot Watcher was regularized on 26.10.2012.

Whereas, his juniors were regularised as early as on 24.01.1995. Hence,

there is a vast disparity and discrimination in the matter of regularization

of service of the petitioner on par with his juniors, Venkatachalam and

others, who were brought under regular time scale of pay on 24.01.1995.

The Government issued an order in G.O.Ms.No.64, Environment and

Forest Department, dated 08.03.1999, whereby G.O.Ms.No.332,

Environment and Forest Department, dated 22.12.1994, was superseded or

revoked, by virtue of which, the requirement of SSLC as a qualification for

appointment to the post of Plot Watcher is no longer in existence. The

petitioner further states that, similarly placed persons, namely,

P.Sundaram and P.Govindan and 23 others filed W.P.Nos.15561 of 2006

and 23374 of 2008 before this Court and the same was disposed on

10.03.2008 and 30.10.2009, respectively, with a direction to consider their

claim for appointment as Forest Watcher on par with their juniors. As

against the said order, the Department went on appeal in W.A.Nos.690 of

2008 and 607 of 2010 and the same were dismissed by the Division Bench https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.23409 of 2023

of this Court on 13.10.2009 and 29.03.2010 respectively. Pursuant to the

dismissal of the appeals, the respondents implemented the orders of this

Court by passing orders dated 15.11.2010 and 07.01.2010 respectively

and in the light of the G.O.[2D] No.122, dated 12.08.2022.

3.The grievance of the petitioner is that he is also similarly

placed and therefore, the benefits of the orders of this Court have to be

extended to the petitioner also and in this regard, the petitioner has made

several representations to regularize the service of the petitioner as per the

Government Order, however, the same were not considered by the

respondents. Therefore, the petitioner filed a writ petition in

W.P.No.28329 of 2022 and the writ petition was disposed of, by order

dated 27.10.2022, directing the respondents to dispose of the

representation of the petitioner. Pursuant to the directions of this Court,

now, the 1st respondent, vide impugned order dated 05.04.2023, has

rejected the claim of the petitioner citing the judgment of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court of India in Secretary to Government, School Education

Department v. R.Govindasamy and others [2014 (4) SCC 769] and also

by stating that the petitioner has already availed the benefit of service

regularisation as per the Government policy and he cannot seek another https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.23409 of 2023

benefit such as pension and family pension. Challenging the same, the

present writ petition has been filed.

4.The learned Government Advocate placed reliance on the order

of the Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.158 of 2016 and batch of

cases and submitted that, in the said Writ Appeal, the Division Bench of

this Court has held that the Government servants who were appointed in

non-provincialized service, consolidate pay, honoarium or daily wages

basis before 01.04.2003, but were absorbed in regular service after

01.0.2003, will not be entitled to count half of their past service for the

purpose of determination of qualifying service for pension. Further,

Special Leave Petitions filed by certain petitioners against the said order

has also been dismissed. Hence, he submitted that the impugned order

does not warrant any interference.

5.Admittedly, the grievance of the writ petitioner is that he is

seeking regularization of service for pensionary benefits. It is the

contention of the writ petitioner that similarly persons have been given

such benefits as per orders in W.A.Nos.690 of 2008 and 607 of 2010,

dated 13.10.2009 and 29.03.2010 respectively, and the Government Order https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.23409 of 2023

in G.O.[2BD] No.64, Environment and Forest Department, dated

08.03.1999. As per the above Government Orders, the relief has been

extended to the similarly placed persons. Hence, the respondents shall also

consider the case of the petitioner in the light the above Government

Orders, as the benefit has been extended to similarly placed persons. In

fact, the Plot Watchers are frontline soldiers in forest and they are the main

protectors of the forest. These facts cannot be disputed by any one.

Hence, while passing the orders, the Government shall take into

consideration the nature of service rendered by the petitioners and also the

fact that, when similarly placed persons have already been granted the

relief, if the petitioners are not granted such relief, the same is nothing but

discrimination and violative of Article 14 of Constitution of India.

6.In such view of the matter, the impugned order of the 1 st

respondent, dated 05.04.2023, is set aside and the respondents shall

extend the benefits as per above Government Orders to the petitioner, as it

is extended to similarly situated persons. Such an exercise shall be

completed within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy

of this order.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.23409 of 2023

7.Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.




                                                                                         10.08.2023

                    mkn

                    Internet : Yes
                    Index    : Yes / No
                    Neutral citation : Yes / No
                    Speaking order / Nonspeaking order

                    To

                    1.The Additional Chief Secretary,
                      Government of Tamil Nadu,
                      Environment and Forest Department,
                      Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

2.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, (Head of Forest Force) Velachery Main Road, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032.

N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.23409 of 2023

mkn

W.P.No.23409 of 2023

10.08.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter