Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4870 Mad
Judgement Date : 26 April, 2023
Cont.P. No.776 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 26.04.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V. THAMILSELVI
Cont. P. No. 776 of 2023
in
Crl.O.P. No. 21701 of 2022
G.Venkat Narayana ... Petitioner
Versus
Mrs.Pushpa,
Inspector of Police (Crime),
J4 Kotturpuram Police Station,
Kotturpuram,
Chennai-600 085. ... Respondent
PRAYER : Contempt Petition has been filed under Section 11 of Contempt
of Court Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondent for willfully and
deliberately disobeying the judgment dated 19.01.2023 of this Hon'ble
Court passed in Crl.O.P.No.21701 of 2022.
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Cont.P. No.776 of 2023
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Soundararajan
For Respondent : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar,
Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side)
ORDER
Earlier, this Court by an order dated 19.01.2023 in Crl.O.P.No.21701
of 2022 passed the following order :-
“It is case of cheating the defacto complainant by giving a false promise that the job will be secured in this High Court. In ca case of this nature since second respondent has not complied the undertaking given before this court, investigation is still yet to be completed, bail already granted to the second respondent in Crl.M.P.No.3997 of 2021 by the learned IX Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Saidapet, Chennai on 01.04.2021 stands cancelled. The first respondent is directed to proceed in accordance with law.”
2. The contention of the petitioner is that he has communicated the
said order to the then Inspector of Police (Crime) on 29.01.2023 itself with a
web copy of this court to implement the same, but the respondent simply
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P. No.776 of 2023
ignored the order of this court and remain silent till date. Subsequently, he
has sent a contempt notice dated 27.02.2023 to the respondent, which was
received by them on 28.02.2023, but even after that notice also, they
remained silent, which is nothing but a willful disobedience of the order of
this case. Hence, the petitioner has filed the present contempt petition.
3. Earlier, when this matter came up for hearing on 31.03.2023,
learned Additional Public Prosecutor appeared and submitted that since the
accused person is absconding, they are not able to secure him and hence,
sought four weeks time for taking steps to secure him. Today, when the
matter taken up for hearing, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for
respondent appeared and submitted that in pursuant to the order passed by
this Court, the accused person was secured on 18.04.2023 and they are
proceeding the case in accordance with law, thereby the order passed by this
court is complied with. Hence, he prayed to close this Contempt Petition.
4. Considering the fact that the order passed by this court has been
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P. No.776 of 2023
duly complied with, no further adjudication is required in this Contempt
Petition. Accordingly, this Contempt Petition stands closed.
26.04.2023
rpp
To
1. Mrs.Pushpa, Inspector of Police, J4, Kotturpuram Police Station, Chennai-85.
2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P. No.776 of 2023
T.V. THAMILSELVI, J.
rpp
Cont. P. No.776 of 2023
26.04.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!