Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4748 Mad
Judgement Date : 25 April, 2023
2023/MHC/2164
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 25.04.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
C.M.A(MD)No.426 of 2023
1.Amutha
2.karunanithi :Appellants/Claimants
.vs.
1.Anbalagan
2.The Manager(Law),
Bharathi Axa General Insurance Company Limited,
162, Metro Plaza, Second Floor,
Anna Salai,
Chennai. :Respondents/Respondents
(R1 was set exparte before the Tribunal. Hence notice may be
given up as against R1)
PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the
Motor Vehicles Act for enhancement of compensation against the
judgment and decretal order made in M.C.O.P.No.198 of 2011,
dated 20.12.2013, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims
Tribunal/Special District Court, Thanjavur.
For Appellant :Mr.G.Karnan
For Respondent-1 :Exparte before the Tribunal
For Respondent-2 :Mr.P.Pethu Rajesh
1/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
JUDGMENT
*************
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed seeking enhancement
of compensation by the claimants.
2.The parties are referred to herein as per their ranking
before the Tribunal.
3.The breief facts leading to the filing of the appeal is as
follows:
The deceased Karthi, son of the Petitioners, was aged about
21 years at the time of accident and he was travelling in a motor
cycle bearing Registration NO. TN 45 K 8604 from West to east in
Thanjavur-Nagapattinam Highways and at about 7.30 p.m., the
lorry bearing Registration No. TN 04 L 7374 driven by its driver in
a rash and negligent manner and dashed against the motor cycle
and as a result, the deceased succumbed to injujries and he was
earning a sum of Rs.6000/-p.m. Hence the parents of the deceased
claim compensation.
4.The second respodnent took a stand that the driver of the
lorry has valid driving licence and he had driven the lorry
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis cautiously and only the decreased drove the motor vehicle in a
rash and negligent manner and caused the accident.
5.Before the Tribunal, on the side of the Petitioners, P.W.1 and
P.W.2 were examined and Ex.P1 to Ex.P4 were marked. On the side
of the respondents, P.W.1 was examined and Ex.R1 was marked.
6.Based on the evidence and other connected materials, the
Tribunal held that the driver of the lorry drove the vehcile in a
rash and negligent manner and caused the accident and these
aspects has not been challenged by the Insurance Company. The
present appeal has been filed challenging only the quantum of
compensation awarded by the Tribunal.The Tribunal has awarded
the compensation as follows:
1.For loss of income - Rs.,5,40,000/-
2.For loss of love and - Rs.30,000/-
affection for petitioners
1 and 2
3.For funeral expenses - Rs.5000/-
--------------------
total - Rs.5,75,000/-
---------------------
7.The Tribunal has fixed the notional income at Rs.4,500/-
and deducted one third amount of the salary towards personal
expenses of the deceased and adopted multiplier of 15 for the age
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis of the parents/mother. Aggrieved over the same, the present appeal
is filed.
8.It is the main contention of the learned counsel for the
appellants that that the Tribunal has adopted only 15 multiplier
instead of 18. Therefore multiplier 18 has to be applied and
compensation has to be increased accordingly. The Tribunal has
also not added future prospects.Further the tribunal has deducted
one third amount of the salary considering the age of the mother.
As the appeal is limited only to the quantum of compensation, this
Court is of the view that the Tribunal is not correct in deducting
one third and applying multiplier of 15 considering the age of the
mother.
9. It is now well settled that the age of the deceased has to
be taken into consideration for adopting the multiplier. The
deceased is aged 21 years at the time of accident. Accordingly the
proper multiplier is 18.This Court maintained the notional income
fixed by the Tribunal. If the notional income is taken as Rs.4500/-
and if 40% of the income is taken as future prospectus of the
deceased and if it is added to the notional income, the total income
comes to Rs.6300/- and if 50% is deducted towards personal
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis income of the deceased, the income comes to Rs.3150/- and if the
same is multiplied by 12 x 18, the total loss of income comes to Rs.
6,80,400/-.That apart, the tribunal has only awarded Rs.30,000/- for
loss of love affection to Petitioners 1 and 2 at Rs.15,000/- each and
the same is enhanced to Rs.40,000/- each and it will come to Rs.
80,000/- and the award of Rs.15,000/- towards funeral expenses is
confirmed. Thus the total compensation payable to the claimants
comes to Rs.7,75,400/- which is tabulated as follows:
S.No Name of the Awarded by Awarded by Remarks heads the Tribunal this Court 1 For loss of Rs. Rs. enhanced income 5,40,000/- 6,80,400/-
2 For loss of love Rs.30,000/- Rs.80,000/- enhanced and affection to (Rs.15,000/-
the Petitioners 1 each)
and 2
3 For funeral Rs.15,000/- Rs.15,000/- same
expenses
6 Total Rs. Rs. enhanced
5,75,000/- 7,75,400/-
with interest at the rate of 7.5%p.a., from the date of claim petition
till the date of realization.
10.In the result, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is allowed
and the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is enhanced from
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Rs.5,75,000/- to Rs.7,75,400/- with interest at the rate of 7.5%p.a.,
from the date of claim petition till the date of realization. The
appellants are not entitled to interest for the delay period of 510
days as per order in C.M.P(MD)No.4677 of 2019, dated 30.3.2023.
The second respondent Insurance Company is directed to deposit
the above said enhanced award amount with accrued interest and
costs, less the award amount if any already deposited, to the credit
of the claim petition before the Tribunal, within a period of four
weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. On such
deposit being made, the claimants are permitted to withdraw equal
share in the above said award amount ie,,3,87,700/- each with
proportionate accrued interest and costs, less the award amount if
any already withdrawn, by filing proper application before the
Tribunal. The claimants are directed to pay the excess court fee
towards the enhanced award amount before the Registry. Only on
such deposit being made, Registry is directed to draft the decree in
the above appeal. No costs.
25.04.2023
Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No NCC:Yes/No vsn
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis To
1.The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (Special District Court), Thanjavur..
2.The Record Keeper, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis N.SATHISH KUMAR.,J.
vsn
JUDGMENT MADE IN C.M.A(MD)No.426 of 2023
25.04.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!