Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4202 Mad
Judgement Date : 13 April, 2023
Crl.R.C.No.1282 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :13.04.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
Criminal Revision Case No.1282 of 2020
P.Raju .. Petitioner
/versus/
U.Ram Babu .. Respondent
Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Section 397(1) r/w
401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the judgment of
conviction against the petitioner dated 30.01.2020 in C.A.No.178 of 2017
on the file of the III Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai and confirming
the conviction and the sentence imposed by the learned Metropolitan
Magistrate Fast Track III at Saidapet, Chennai by its judgment dated
30.06.2017 made in C.C.No.1088 of 2013 and acquit the
petitioner/appellant.
For Petitioner :No appearance
For Respondent :Mr.K.N.Nataraj
------
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/4
Crl.R.C.No.1282 of 2020
ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioner.
2. This criminal revision case is filed against the concurrent finding
of the Courts below holding the revision petitioner guilty of the offence
under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for issuance of
a cheque for Rs.1,25,00,000/- without sufficient fund in his account.
3. While admitting the revision, on 06.01.2021 this Court imposed a
condition that the petitioner was directed to deposit half of the
compensation amount to the credit of C.C.No.1088 of 2013 on the file of
the Metropolitan Magistrate, Fast Track Court III, Saidapet, Chennai on
or before 27.01.2021.
4. When the matter was taken up for hearing on 03.06.2021, this
Court found that the conditional order was not complied with and there
was no representation for the petitioner to report the compliance. Hence,
the Miscellaneous Petition No.8999 of 2021 filed for suspension of
sentence was dismissed for non-prosecution.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.R.C.No.1282 of 2020
5. Today, when the matter was taken up for consideration, there is
no representation for the petitioner. It is reported that earlier, the matter
was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court,
Madras and in the Mediation, the revision petitioner did not appear.
6. Taking note of the fact that there is no representation for the
revision petitioner and the revision petitioner has failed to comply the
conditional order passed by this Court on 06.01.2021, this criminal
revision case is dismissed for non -prosecution.
13.04.2023 Index:yes/no ari
To:
1.The III Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai.
2.The Metropolitan Magistrate Fast Track III at Saidapet, Chennai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.R.C.No.1282 of 2020
Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.
ari
Crl.R.C.No.1282 of 2020
13.04.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!