Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3860 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 April, 2023
W.P.Nos.5789, 5807 of 2004
& 37121 to 37124 of 2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.04.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.Nos.5789, 5807 of 2004 & 37121 to 37124 of 2006
and
W.V.M.P.No.1232 of 2004, M.P.Nos.6778 & 6788 of 2004,
3 & 3 of 2006
W.P.No.5789 of 2004:
The Virudhunagar Coriander
Seeds Merchant's Association,
Represented by its Secretary,
Virudhunagar. ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.State of Tamil Nadu,
rep. by its Secretary to Government,
Agricultural Department,
Fort St. George,
Chennai – 600 009.
2.The Commissioner of Agricultural Marketing,
Guindy,
Chennai – 600 032.
3.The Secretary,
Ramanathapuram Market Committee,
at Virudhunagar. ... Respondents
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.5789, 5807 of 2004 & 37121 to 37124 of 2006
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from levying and collecting fee in respect of Coriander under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1987 and the Rules made there under or in the case of Bye-laws in the Ramanathapuram and surrounding notified areas including to launch prosecution or any penal drastic action.
For Petitioners : Mr.G.Sankaran
Senior Counsel
For Mr.S.Nedunchezliyan
(in all WPs)
For R1 & R2 : Mr.P.Sanjay Gandhi
Government Advocate
(in all WPs)
For R3 : Mr.P.Navaneetha Krishnan
(in all WPs)
COMMON ORDER
The writ on hand has been instituted seeking the relief to forbear the
respondents from levying and collecting fee in respect of Coriander under the
provisions of the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation)
Act, 1987 and the Rules made there under or in the case of Bye-laws in the
Ramanathapuram and surrounding notified areas including to launch
prosecution or any penal drastic action.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.5789, 5807 of 2004 & 37121 to 37124 of 2006
2. The petitioner is the Virudhunagar Coriander Seeds Merchant's
Association.
3. The learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the writ
petitioners mainly contended that the Government issued G.O.Ms.No.1635
Agriculture (AM-II) Department dated 27.09.1977, declaring coriander as
notified agricultural produce for Ramanathapuram composite District.
Thereafter, the Government issued G.O.Ms.No.877, Agriculture (AM-II)
Department dated 26.04.1984 rescinding the notification dated 27.09.1997 in
respect of coconut and coriander under Section 4(1) of the Tamil Nadu
Agriculture Produce Marketing Act.
4. The learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners
reiterated that the said Government order was cancelled in G.O.Ms.No.312
and the G.O.Ms.No.359, dated 10.05.1991 and 30.06.1995 respectively. The
contentions of the petitioners are that they are not liable to pay marketing fee
as levy.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.5789, 5807 of 2004 & 37121 to 37124 of 2006
5. The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners mainly contended
that de-notifying the produce namely coriander and thereafter restoring the
same would cause prejudice to the interest of the petitioner / Association.
6. It is contended that the respondents cannot levy and collect the fee
in respect of the coriander under the provisions of the Act in view of the
notifications issued and cancelled subsequently. Ultimately, the petitioner
states that the levy and collection of fee in respect of coriander is untenable.
7. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents brought
to the notice of this Court that several developments occurred during the
pendency of the writ petition. The Government issued various orders in the
year 1995 and thereafter, a notification was issued on 27.05.2014 in
G.O.Ms.No.64, Agriculture (AM-II) Department. As per the revised
notification, the members of the petitioner Association are liable to pay the
marketing fee as per the Government notification.
8. The learned senior counsel brought to the notice of this Court that
even in the year 2022, the Government issued order in G.O.Ms.No.84,
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.5789, 5807 of 2004 & 37121 to 37124 of 2006
Agricultural and Farmers Welfare Department, dated 23.04.2022. Pursuant to
the government order, a Committee was constituted and if at all the
petitioners are aggrieved, they have to submit their objections before the
Committee constituted by virtue of G.O.Ms.No.84, Agricultural and Farmers
Welfare Department, dated 23.04.2022. Regarding payment of marketing fee,
the learned counsel for the respondents brought to the notice of this Court
that the issue was considered by this Court in W.P.Nos.13147 and 13148 of
2013 and the judgment was delivered on 06.09.2018 reported in [CDJ 2018
MIIC 5084]. The provisions of the Act and Rules were considered by this
Court and it is held that the petitioners therein are liable to pay marketing fee
as per the rules in force.
9. Writ Appeals in W.A.Nos.1427 and 1429 of 2019 was filed and the
Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court confirmed the said judgment on
24.04.2019 reported in [CDJ 2019 MHC 1971]. Therefore, the petitioners are
liable to pay the marketing fee.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.5789, 5807 of 2004 & 37121 to 37124 of 2006
10. May that as it be, if at all any grievances exist for the petitioners
they are at liberty to file their objections before the Committee constituted by
the Government. However, the relief as such sought for cannot be granted.
11. If any due arises on account of the interim order granted by this
Court or otherwise, the respondents are bound to recover the same in the
manner known to law. Accordingly, these Writ Petitions stand dismissed. No
costs. Connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
12. In view of the dismissal of the writ petition, there is no impediment
for the respondents to recover the arrears if any to be collected in accordance
with the Act and Rules.
06.04.2023
Jeni Index : Yes Speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.5789, 5807 of 2004 & 37121 to 37124 of 2006
To
1.The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Agricultural Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.
2.The Commissioner of Agricultural Marketing, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032.
3.The Secretary, Ramanathapuram Market Committee, at Virudhunagar.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.5789, 5807 of 2004 & 37121 to 37124 of 2006
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.
Jeni
W.P.Nos.5789, 5807 of 2004 & 37121 to 37124 of 2006
06.04.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!