Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 15635 Mad
Judgement Date : 21 September, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21.09.2022
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice PARESH UPADHYAY
and
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
W.A.No.2163 of 2022
and C.M.P.No.16124 of 2022
1.The State of Tamil Nadu
through its Secretary,
Department of School Education,
Fort St. George, Chennai – 9.
2.The Director of School Education,
D.P.I. Campus,
College Road, Chennai.
3.The Joint Director of School Education
(Vocational),
College Road, Chennai.
4.The Chief Educational Officer,
Salem District.
5.The District Educational Officer,
Edapadi, Salem District. ..Appellants
Vs
1.S.Madhu
2.The Accountant General,
(Accounts and Establishments),
361, Anna Salai,
Teynampet, Chennai – 18. ..Respondents
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2
Appeal preferred under Clause XV of Letters Patent against the
order dated 09.09.2021 made in W.P.No.19083 of 2021.
For Appellants .. Mr.Abishek Moorthy,
Govt. Advocate
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.)
This writ appeal is directed against the order of the learned
single Judge dated 09.09.2021 in W.P.No.19083 of 2021 in and by
which the learned single Judge had allowed the prayer of the writ
petitioner to include 50% of the service rendered by the writ petitioner
as Double Part Time Vocational Teacher from 01.07.1987 to
15.10.1992 for the purpose of the pension and pensionary benefits.
2. On a perusal of the order, it would be clear that the very
issue was referred to Full Bench of this Court in the matter of
Government of Tamil Nadu Vs. R.Kaliyamoorthy and others
(W.A.No.158 of 2016 etc., batch dated 03.12.2019) in which the Full
Bench answered the issue in favour of the writ petitioners and the
learned single Judge had only followed the dictum of the Full Bench
and as a matter of fact, granted the relief.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
3. Mr.Abishek Moorthy, learned Government Advocate
appearing on behalf of the appellants would vehemently contest that
the Full Bench decision is not applicable to the instant case.
4. On a perusal of the judgment of the Full Bench referred to
above, it is clear that the issue is very much covered by the Full Bench
judgment and the other submission that there is a delay on the part of
the writ petitioner in approaching the Court is also without any merits
as the prayer is with reference to the grant of pension and pensionary
benefits.
5. We do not see any infirmity in the order of learned single
Judge. Therefore, finding no merits, this writ appeal is dismissed. No
costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
(P.U.J.,) (D.B.C.J.,) 21.09.2022 Index:Yes/No mmi/14
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
PARESH UPADHYAY, J.
and D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
mmi
W.A.No.2163 of 2022
21.09.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!