Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 15518 Mad
Judgement Date : 19 September, 2022
S.A.No.1175 of 2000
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 19.09.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
S.A.No.1175 of 2000
1. Nanjammal
2. Karuppanan
3. Kanniappan
4. Madeswaran
5. Palaniammal
6. Baby @ Bakkialakshmi
7. Minor Gunasekaran
8. Minor Karthikeyan
(Minors 7 & 8 are represented by their mother
and natural guardian Palaniammal)
9. Annammal
10. Karuppusamy (Deceased)
11. Thangaraju
12. Thangamani
13. Indirani
14. Dhanalakshmi
15. Arunthavaselvi
16. Kannaiappan
(Appellants 14 to 16 brought on record as
LRs of the deceased 10th appellant vide order of Court
dated 25.01.2019 made in CMP.No.3660 to 3662 of 2018
in SA.No.1175 of 2000) .. Appellants
Versus
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/4
S.A.No.1175 of 2000
1. Kannan
2. Varadharajan
3. Ayyammal
4. Emmperumal
5. Krishna
6. Duraisamy
7. Sivabakkiam
8. Matheswaran
9. Soundarrarajan
10. Anandhan
11. Akilandeswari
12. Dharmalingam
13. Sumathi
14. Dr.Vasu .. Respondents
Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure
Code against the judgment and decree dated 27.07.1999 passed in
A.S.No.59 of 1994 on the file of the II Additional District Judge, Erode,
reversing the judgment and decree dated 23.02.1994 passed in
O.S.No.801 of 1983 on the file of the II Additional District Munsif,
Erode.
For Appellants : Ms.P.Vidhyashree
for M/s. P.T.Ramadevi
For R1 : died
For R2 to R14 : Given up
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2/4
S.A.No.1175 of 2000
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel appearing for the appellants submitted that
the first respondent, who is the contesting respondent in the present
second Appeal passed away. However, no particulars relating to the
death certificate of the deceased, details of the legal heirs, etc. were
furnished so as to file a petition to implead the legal heirs of the deceased
first respondent. Therefore, the learned counsel is unable to proceed with
the case. She has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court
bundle.
2.Recording the submissions and the endorsement so made by
the learned counsel for the appellants, this second appeal is dismissed as
abated. No costs.
19.09.2022
Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No
av
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.No.1175 of 2000
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J.,
av
To
1. The II Additional District Judge, Erode.
2. The II Additional District Munsif, Erode.
3. The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court of Madras, Chennai 600 104.
S.A.No.1175 of 2000
19.09.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!