Wednesday, 03, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M.Murugesan vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu
2022 Latest Caselaw 15467 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 15467 Mad
Judgement Date : 16 September, 2022

Madras High Court
M.Murugesan vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 16 September, 2022
                                                                               W.P(MD)No.17716 of 2022


                       BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                               DATED : 16.09.2022

                                                     CORAM

                            THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

                                             W.P(MD)No.17716 of 2022
                                                       and
                                       W.M.P.(MD)Nos.12906 and 12907 of 2022

                M.Murugesan                                                      ... Petitioner

                                                          Vs

                1.The Government of Tamil Nadu,
                  Rep by its Secretary to Government,
                  Transport Department,
                  Fort St.George,
                  Chennai – 600 009.

                2.The Managing Director,
                  Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd.,
                  Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.

                3.The General Manager,
                  Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd.,
                  Trichy Region, Periyamilaguparai,
                  Trichirapalli District.                                ... Respondents



                Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
                praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the entire records
                pertaining        to     the   impugned        order   dated     01.01.2022        in
                Ref. TNSTC/KUM/TRY/DS/SM1/16183/2021 passed by the 3rd respondent
                and quash the same and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to sanction

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                1/4
                                                                               W.P(MD)No.17716 of 2022


                surrender leave salary for 79.5 days to the petitioner within the time limit that
                may be fixed by this Court.



                                  For Petitioner   : Mr.N.Sudhagar Nagaraj

                                  For Respondents : Mr.A.K.Manikkam,
                                                        Spl. Government Pleader for R1.
                                                    Mr.K.Jagadees Balan,
                                                        Standing Counsel for R2 & R3.


                                                     ORDER

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2.The writ petitioner is a retired employee of the transport corporation.

His specific allegation is that he was not disbursed with the surrender leave

salary benefit. The petitioner had earlier filed W.P.(MD)No.16183 of 2021.

This Court vide order dated 09.09.2021 directed the respondent to pass order on

the petitioner's representation dated 31.07.2021 in the light of the judgment

passed in W.A.(MD)No.1138 of 2019. The grievance of the writ petitioner is

that even pursuant to the said direction, the employer has not paid his surrender

leave salary benefit. The petitioner would further argue that the respondents is

deliberately confusing the issue between earned leave salary and surrender

leave salary benefits.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P(MD)No.17716 of 2022

3.When the matter was taken up for hearing, I posed a specific question

to the respondents as to whether the petitioner is entitled to surrender leave

salary or not. The answer is in the affirmative. The respondents categorically

state that the petitioner was having to his credit total number of 79 days

towards surrender leave. The respondents 2 and 3 are directed to quantify the

amount payable to the writ petitioner and pay the same within a period of

twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4.The writ petition is allowed accordingly. No costs. Consequently,

connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.




                                                                      16.09.2022
                Index             : Yes / No
                Internet          : Yes/ No
                ias

                To:-

                The Principal Secretary,
                Transport Department,
                Fort St.George,
                Chennai – 600 009.




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

                                         W.P(MD)No.17716 of 2022




                                  G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

                                                            ias




                                  W.P(MD)No.17716 of 2022




                                                  16.09.2022



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter