Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 15388 Mad
Judgement Date : 15 September, 2022
WP.No.29534 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15.09.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
WP.No.29534 of 2016
Brindha Devi ... Petitioner
Vs
1. The District Registrar,
Tiruppur District, Tiruppur.
2. The Sub Registrar,
Dharapuram, Tiruppur District. ... Respondents
Prayer:- This Writ Petition is filed, under the Article 226 of Constitution of
India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records
pertaining to the proceedings of the second respondent in Check Slip No.1
of 2016 dated 19.02.2016 and quash the same as illegal and not in
consonance with law and consequential direction directing the 2nd
respondent to register the settlement deed dated 27.10.2016.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Guruprasad
For Respondents : Mr.PRAjarajeswari, G.A. – R1 & R2
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP.No.29534 of 2016
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed to call for the records pertaining to the
proceedings of the second respondent in Check Slip No.1 of 2016 dated
19.02.2016 and quash the same as illegal and not in consonance with law
and consequential direct the 2nd respondent to register the settlement deed
dated 27.10.2016.
2. It is the contention of the petitioner that when the settlement deed
was presented for registration, it was returned by the registering authority
mainly on the ground that there was previous encumbrance registered in the
year 2010. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner has purchased
the property in the year 2002 and she has been enjoying the property. When
she presented the settlement deed in the year 2016, the Registrar has refused
to register the document. Hence, seeks a direction to Register the
Settlement Deed.
3. It is relevant to note that the Division Bench of this Court in the
judgment in N.Ramayee Vs. The Sub Registrar and another in
W.P.No.674 of 2020 dated 05.11.2020, has clearly held that the registering
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP.No.29534 of 2016
authority cannot refuse to register a document merely on the basis that some
other encumbrance has already been created.
4. In such view of the matter, this Court is of the view that the
Registrar has no right to refuse to register the document, except the
documents relating to immovable properties mentioned in Section 22-A of
the Tamil Nadu Act, the registering authority is bound to register the
document.
4. Accordingly, the second respondent is directed to register the
document, though 6 years have lapsed after presentation of the document, in
view of S.47 of the Registration Act, the date of execution of the document
is a prime factor for considering the validity of the document.
5. With the above directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No
costs.
15.09.2022 vrc Index:Yes/No
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP.No.29534 of 2016
Web:Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking
To,
1. The District Registrar, Tiruppur District, Tiruppur.
2. The Sub Registrar, Dharapuram, Tiruppur District.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP.No.29534 of 2016
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
vrc
WP.No.29534 of 2016
15.09.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!