Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 15329 Mad
Judgement Date : 14 September, 2022
S.A.No.71 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14.09.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA
S.A.No.71 of 2022
and C.M.P.Nos.7785 and 9252 of 2022
K.L.Sinnu Reddy .. Appellant
-Vs.-
1.K.L.Siddu Reddy
2.S.K.P.Muruagan .. Respondents
Prayer: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the
Judgment and decree dated 15/03/2021 passed in A.S.No.60 of 2015, on the
file of the Sub-Judge, Bhavani, Erode District, confirming the Judgment and
Decree dated 04/01/2014, passed in O.S.No.433 of 2010 on the file of the
Principal District Munsif's Court Bhavani, Erode District.
For Appellant : Mr.M.Santhanamari
For Respondents : Mr.V.Lakshminarayanan
for Mr.R.Jeyaram for R1
Mr.N.Manokaran for R2
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.No.71 of 2022
JUDGMENT
When the matter is taken up for hearing today, it is pointed out by the
learned counsel appearing for the respondents that this second appeal has
been filed against a dead person. It is also informed that a connected Second
Appeal in S.A.No.469 of 2019 filed by the very same appellant is pending.
The appellant had died on 06.05.2021 and the present second appeal has
been numbered on 23.12.2021 after the death of the appellant. Therefore,
the learned counsel for the appellant ought to have filed the appeal with a
petition to accept the cause title. Ultimately, the learned counsel was kept
informed about the same and as a result, the appeal has been filed in the
name of the dead person. Once the mistake is pointed out in the form of
C.M.P.No.9252 of 2022, namely, to dismiss the second appeal, steps have
been taken to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased
appellant, such a petition is not maintainable. If the death has occurred even
before the filing of the appeal and the appellant ought to have taken out a
petition to accept the cause title, the learned counsel for the appellant seeks
permission of this Court to withdraw the second appeal seeking liberty to
file a second appeal with the condone delay petition.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.71 of 2022
2. Considering the fact that the connected S.A.No.469 of 2019 is
also pending, the request made by the learned counsel for the appellant is
granted. Therefore, the second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn granting
liberty to the appellant to file a fresh Second Appeal with the condone delay
petition. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are
closed.
14.09.2022
To
1. The Sub-Judge, Bhavani, Erode District.
2. The Principal District Munsif Court, Bhavani, Erode District.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.71 of 2022
P.T.ASHA, J.,
srn
S.A.No.71 of 2022 and C.M.P.Nos.7785 and 9252 of 2022
14.09.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!