Wednesday, 03, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jeyapaul vs State Rep. By Its
2022 Latest Caselaw 15248 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 15248 Mad
Judgement Date : 13 September, 2022

Madras High Court
Jeyapaul vs State Rep. By Its on 13 September, 2022
                                                                                  Crl.R.C.(MD).No.875 of 2022


                             BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                         DATED: 13.09.2022

                                                             CORAM

                                    THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN

                                                  Crl.R.C.(MD).No.875 of 2022
                                               and Crl.M.P.(MD).No.10910 of 2022

                     Jeyapaul                                           ... Petitioner/Accused No.4

                                                                Vs.

                     State rep. by its
                     Inspector of Police,
                     Mathichiyam Police Station,
                     Mathichiyam, Madurai City.                         .. Respondent/Respondent
                     PRAYER: This Civil Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of
                     the Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records relation to the order,
                     dated 06.07.2022, passed by the learned Additional District Judge/Presiding
                     Officer, the 1st Additional Special Court for EC and NDPS Act Cases,
                     Madurai, in Cr.M.P.No.642 of 2022 in C.C.No.556 of 2021 and set aside the
                     same and allow the above Criminal Revision Petition as prayed for.
                                        For Petitioner      : Mr.A.Jeyaram

                                        For Respondent      : Mr.T.Senthil Kumar
                                                              Additional Public Prosecutor

                                                             ORDER

This Criminal Revision Case has been filed against the order passed

in Cr.M.P.No.642 of 2022 in C.C.No.556 of 2021 on the file of the 1 st

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.(MD).No.875 of 2022

Additional Special Court for EC and NDPS Act Cases, Madurai, dated

06.07.2022.

2.This petitioner/A4 has filed the petition before the trial Court under

Section 2(a) of the NDPS Act and under Section 45 of the Evidence Act

praying the Court to weigh the entire case property and send the samples

from the case property to the Chemical analysis for re-testing. The same

was dismissed by the trial Court observing that as per the Judgment of the

Honourable Supreme Court in the case of Thana Singh Vs. Central Bureau

of Narcotics, reported in 2013 Crl.L.J. 1262, any requests as to re-

resting/re-sampling shall be made within 15 days from the date of receipt of

the report. However, only in exceptional circumstances, such type of

applications can be entertained.

3.According to the learned Additional Public Prosecutor the

application before the trial Court was not properly filed. Even as per the

order of the trial Court in para No.6, the sample was taken on 21.06.2021

and sent for analysis on 08.09.2021 and the analysis report dated

15.09.2021 was received by the Court on 08.10.2021 and the report

concludes that the samples are Ganja. This petition for re-resting has been

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.(MD).No.875 of 2022

filed only on 09.06.2022. So admittedly, within 15 days, the above said

request has not been sent. Since the petitioner was sent to the prison,

unless a strong case is made out by the petitioner for re-testing that cannot

be entertainable.

4.According to the petitioner, absolutely the sample that was taken

from the petitioner is not Kanja, it is only cow-dung powder and that was

not sent for analysis. It is purely a put up case. Since it is a dispute between

father and son, based on the complaint given by the father, the petitioner

was taken to police station.

5.Whether it is a false case or not, it is a matter for consideration

during the trial. Unless a strong case has been made out by the petitioner,

application for re-testing cannot be entertained. At the time of framing the

charge, this petition came to be filed by the petitioner. Therefore, I find no

illegality in the order passed by the trial Court. The trial Court has rightly

rejected the request of the petitioner. This Court is not inclined to interfere

with the order passed by the trial Court under Section 397 Cr.P.C. This

Criminal Revision Case deserves to be dismissed.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.(MD).No.875 of 2022

5.Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

13.09.2022 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No TM

To

1.The I Additional Special District Judge, 1st Additional Special Court for EC and NDPS Act Cases, Madurai.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.(MD).No.875 of 2022

G.ILANGOVAN,J.

TM

Crl.R.C.(MD).No.875 of 2022

13.09.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter