Wednesday, 03, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The New India Assurance Co. vs Sitalakshmi .. 1St
2022 Latest Caselaw 14941 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14941 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 September, 2022

Madras High Court
The New India Assurance Co. vs Sitalakshmi .. 1St on 7 September, 2022
                                                                              C.M.A.(MD)No.530 of 2018

                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                              DATED : 07.09.2022

                                                    CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU
                                                          and
                            THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH

                              C.M.A.(MD)No.530 of 2018 and C.M.P(MD)No.6243 of 2018
                                                       and
                                        Cross Objection (MD)No.27 of 2021


                     C.M.A.(MD)No.530 of 2018:
                     The New India Assurance Co., Ltd.,
                     through its Divisional Manager,
                     Sharon Building,
                     No.161A, East Veli Street,
                     Madurai.                                   .. Appellant/2nd Respondent

                                                   Vs.
                     1.Sitalakshmi                              .. 1st Respondent/ Petitioner
                     2.Gomathi                                  .. 2nd Respondent/1st Respondent

                     PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the

                     Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the award and decree, dated 30.11.2017

                     made in M.C.O.P.No.1519 of 2016, on the file of the Motor Accidents


                     Page 1 of 8




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                              C.M.A.(MD)No.530 of 2018

                     Claims Tribunal/V-Additional District Judge, Madurai.

                                   For Appellant            : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar
                                   For Respondent No.1      : Mr.S.M.Mohan Gandhi
                                   For Respondent No.2      : No appearance


                     Cross Objection (MD)No.27 of 2021:
                     Sitalakshmi                        .. Cross Objector/1st Respondent/
                                                                  Claimant

                                                     Vs.

                     1.Gomathi                                .. 1st Respondent/ 2nd Respondent/
                                                                    1st Respondent

                     2.The New India Assurance Co., Ltd.,
                     through its Divisional Manager,
                     Sharon Building,
                     No.161A, East Veli Street,
                     Madurai.                                  .. 2nd Respondent/ Appellant/
                                                                        2nd Respondent


                     PRAYER: Cross Objection filed under Order 41 Rule 22 of the Civil

                     Procedure Code r/w Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against

                     the award and decree, dated 30.11.2017 made in M.C.O.P.No.1519 of 2016,

                     on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/V-Additional District

                     Judge, Madurai.


                     Page 2 of 8




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                C.M.A.(MD)No.530 of 2018

                                       For Appellant          : Mr.S.M.Mohan Gandhi
                                       For Respondent No.1    : No appearance
                                       For Respondent No.2    : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar


                                                  COMMON JUDGMENT

                     J.NISHA BANU, J.

and N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.

The New India Assurance Company Limited has filed the appeal

challenging the award passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal

(hereinafter referred to as 'MACT'), Madurai, in M.C.O.P.No.1519/2016,

dated 30.11.2017, wherein the Tribunal had directed the Insurance Company

to pay a total compensation of Rs.27,03,500/- along with interest at the rate

of 7.5% from the date of petition till the date of payment.

2. The claimant has filed the cross objection seeking for

enhancement of compensation.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.(MD)No.530 of 2018

3. The husband of the claimant was driving a four wheeler on

29.01.2015 at about 14.30 hours on Virudhunagar – Erichanatham main

road and was proceeding from east to west. While so, the lorry belonging to

the second respondent was driven in a rash and negligent manner and there

was a head on collision with the vehicle driven by the deceased. The

deceased sustained grievous injuries and he succumbed to his injuries on

22.09.2015.

4. The first respondent/claimant filed a claim petition and sought for

compensation from the Insurance Company in which the lorry belonging to

the second respondent was insured.

5. The MACT, after considering the facts and circumstances of the

case and on appreciation of oral and documentary evidence, came to a

conclusion that the accident took place due to rash and negligent driving of

the driver of the lorry. Accordingly, the compensation was fixed under

various heads and a sum of Rs.27,03,500/- was awarded in favour of the

claimant along with interest. Aggrieved by the same, the appeal has been

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.(MD)No.530 of 2018

filed by the Insurance Company mainly questioning the quantum of

compensation and cross objection has been filed by the claimant seeking for

enhancement of compensation.

6. Heard Mr.N.Dilip Kumar appearing for the appellant/New India

Assurance Company and Mr.S.M.Mohan Gandhi appearing for the first

respondent/claimant/cross objector.

7.Insofar as the quantum of compensation is concerned, the Tribunal

took into consideration the fact that the deceased was an ex-serviceman and

he was doing various businesses like mineral water dealership and travels.

The Tribunal fixed the monthly income of the deceased at Rs.30,000/-, on

approximation after considering the various documents that were marked on

the side of the claimant.

8. This Court, on considering the materials available on record and

the finding of the Tribunal, deems it fit to modify the award amount by

fixing the monthly income at Rs.27,500/-. In view of the above, the total

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.(MD)No.530 of 2018

compensation is calculated as follows:

                          Sl.No.                       Heads                       Amount
                                                                                     Rs.
                          1.          Loss of Income                               24,19,956/-

➢ Rs.27,500/- being monthly income, 1/3rd deducted towards personal expenses works out to ➢ [27,500- (27,500x1/3) ➢ 27500-9167=18,333/-] ➢ for 12 months ➢ [18,333x12=2,19,996/-] ➢ adding multiplier 11 ➢ [2,19,996x11=24,19,956/]

2. Transport Charges 2,500/-

3. For damage of clothing and other articles 1,000/-

                          4.          Funeral Expenses                                 10,000/-
                          5.          Loss of consortium                               25,000/-
                          6.          Loss of love and affection                       25,000/-
                                                                          Total    24,83,456/-



9.The award amount fixed by the Tribunal is modified and this Court

fixes the total compensation at Rs.24,83,456/- along with interest at the rate

of 7.5% from the date of petition till the date of realisation with cost.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.(MD)No.530 of 2018

10. This Court, while entertaining the appeal had directed the

Insurance Company to pay the entire award amount with accrued interest

and also permitted the claimant to withdraw 35% of the amount so

deposited. In view of the modification of the total compensation, the

Insurance Company is entitled to withdraw the excess amount deposited

along with accrued interest. The claimant is also permitted to withdraw the

remaining award amount along with accrued interest.

11. Both the civil miscellaneous appeal and the cross-objection are

disposed off accordingly. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous

petition is closed.



                                                                      [J.N.B., J.] [N.A.V., J.]
                                                                            07.09.2022
                     Index              : Yes/No
                     Internet           : Yes
                     PJL


                     To

The V-Additional District Judge/Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Madurai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.(MD)No.530 of 2018

J.NISHA BANU,J.

and N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.

PJL

C.M.A.(MD)No.530 of 2018

07.09.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter