Wednesday, 03, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

G.Sivakumar vs The Chennai City Commissioner Of ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 14914 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14914 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 September, 2022

Madras High Court
G.Sivakumar vs The Chennai City Commissioner Of ... on 6 September, 2022
                                                                               Crl.O.P.No.1143 of 2022

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED: 06.09.2022

                                                      CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

                                               Crl.O.P.No. 1143 of 2022

                     1. G.Sivakumar                                            ... Petitioner
                                                         Vs

                     1. The Chennai City Commissioner of Police,
                        O/o. The Greater Chennai Commissioner of Police,
                        E.V.K.Sampath Salai, Vepery,
                        Chennai – 600007.

                     2. The Assistant Commissioner of Police,
                        O/o. The Assistant Commissioner Office,
                        Anna Nagar Circle,
                        Chennai – 600040.

                     3. The Inspector of Police,
                        V-5, Tirumangalam Police Station,
                        Anna Nagar West Extn;
                        Chennai – 600101.

                     4. N.Ravi                                                ... Respondents

                     Prayer:Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to direct
                     the respondent police to execute the warrant of arrest (Non-Bailable) issued
                     by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court (Magisterial Level),
                     Ambattur within a stipulated period in connection with C.C.No.4 of 2017.


                     1/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                      Crl.O.P.No.1143 of 2022




                                        For Petitioner     : Mr.T.Nixon

                                        For Respondents     : Mr.E.Raj Thilak,
                                                             Additional Public Prosecutor
                                                             (for R1 to R3)

                                                             ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking a direction to

the respondent police to execute the warrant of arrest (Non-Bailable) issued

by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court (Magisterial Level),

Ambattur within a stipulated period in connection with C.C.No.4 of 2017.

2. The petitioner is the complainant and he filed a case in C.C.No.4 of

2017 for the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court (Magisterial Level),

Ambattur as against the fourth respondent herein. The trial Court convicted

him and sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment for the period of

eight months and also directed to pay a compensation of Rs.15,00,000/-.

Aggrieved by the same, the fourth respondent filed an appeal in

Crl.A.No.196 of 2017 and the First Appellate Court dismissed the appeal

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.1143 of 2022

by the judgement dated 17.02.2020. However, the appellate Court modified

the sentence as six months and confirmed the judgment of the trial Court.

Even then, the fourth respondent/accused did not come forward to settle the

amount and thereby did not comply with the judgment of the Courts below.

Therefore, the Trial Court, viz., the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court

(Magisterial Level), Ambattur issued non bailable warrant as against the

fourth respondent / accused and it is pending on the file of the third

respondent herein. However, even till today, the third respondent failed to

execute the non bailable warrant as against the fourth respondent/accused.

3. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, the

third respondent/Inspector of Police is directed to execute the non bailable

warrant issued as against the fourth respondent/accused in C.C.No.4 of

2017 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court (Magisterial

Level), Ambattur within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a

copy of this order. It is made clear that the Petitioner is directed to furnish

the correct address of the fourth respondent and to cooperate while

executing the non bailable warrant issued as against the fourth respondent.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.1143 of 2022

4. With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is

disposed of.

06.09.2022 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non speaking order

kv

To

1. The Chennai City Commissioner of Police, O/o. The Greater Chennai Commissioner of Police, E.V.K.Sampath Salai, Vepery, Chennai – 600007.

2. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, O/o. The Assistant Commissioner Office, Anna Nagar Circle, Chennai – 600040.

3. The Inspector of Police, V-5, Tirumangalam Police Station, Anna Nagar West Extn;

Chennai – 600101.

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.1143 of 2022

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J,

kv

Crl.O.P.No. 1143 of 2022

06.09.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter