Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Y.R.Jeyaraj vs K.Somu
2022 Latest Caselaw 16943 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 16943 Mad
Judgement Date : 28 October, 2022

Madras High Court
Y.R.Jeyaraj vs K.Somu on 28 October, 2022
                                                                        Crl.O.P.(MD) No.15360 of 2022


                            BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                    DATED: 28.10.2022

                                                        CORAM

                         THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP

                                           CRL.O.P (MD) No.15360 of 2022
                                                       and
                                      Crl.M.P(MD) Nos.10086 and 10088 of 2022


                     Y.R.Jeyaraj                                   ...Petitioner/Accused No.2

                                                        -vs-

                     K.Somu                                        ..Respondent/Complainant

                     PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C,
                     praying to call for the records in C.C.No.166 of 2022 pending before the
                     Judicial Magistrate / Fast Track Court (Magistrate level), Tuticorin,
                     Tuticorin District and quash the complaint against the Petitioner / Accused
                     No.2.

                                   For Petitioner      : Ms. Ka.Raamakrishnan

                                   For Respondent      : Mr.S.Sarvagan Prabhu




                     1/6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                               Crl.O.P.(MD) No.15360 of 2022




                                                             ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to call for the records

in C.C.No.166 of 2022 pending before the Judicial Magistrate / Fast Track

Court (Magistrate level), Tuticorin, Tuticorin District and quash the

complaint against the Petitioner / Accused No.2.

2. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that he had

appeared in the similar case in Crl.O.P(MD)No.1145 of 2022, which was

disposed by the learned Single Judge of this Court

(Mr.Justice G.K.Ilanthiraiyan) by order dated 08.03.2022. The learned

Counsel for the Petitioner relied on the 7th paragraph of the said judgment

that,

“7.In this regard, the learned counsel for the petitioner relied

upon the Judgment, 2021(1)566 SCC, in the case of Alka

Khandu Avhad vs Amar Syamprasad Mishra. in which the

Hon'ble Supreme Court of India held that on a fair reading of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.15360 of 2022

Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, before a

person can be prosecuted, the following conditions are

required to be satisfied:

“7. i) that the cheque is drawn by a person and on an account

maintained by him with a banker;

ii) for the payment of any amount of money to another person

from out of that account for the discharge, in whole or in

part, of any debt or other liability; and

iii) the said cheque is returned by the bank unpaid, either

because of the amount of money standing to the credit of that

account is insufficient to honour the cheque or that it exceeds

the amount arranged to be paid from that account.”

Therefore, a person who is the signatory to the cheque and

the cheque is drawn by that person, on an account maintained

by him and the cheque has been issued for the discharge, in

whole or in part, of any debt or other liability and the said

cheque has been returned by the bank unpaid, such person

can be said to have committed an offence. Section 138 of the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.15360 of 2022

Negotiable Instruments Act, does not speak about the joint

liability. Even in case of a joint liability, in case of individual

persons, a person other than a person who has drawn the

cheque on an account maintained by him, cannot be

prosecuted for the offence under Section 138 of the NI Act. A

person might have been jointly liable to pay the debt, but if

such a person who might have been liable to pay the debt

jointly, cannot be prosecuted unless the bank account is

jointly maintained and that he was a signatory to the cheque.

3.In the light of the judgment in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1145 of 2022, the

learned Judicial Magistrate, Thoothukudi is directed to proceed with the

trial as against only the first accused in C.C.No.166 of 2022 and to dispose

this case as expeditiously as possible. The complaint is quashed as against

the second accused in C.C.No.166/2022.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.15360 of 2022

4.In view of the above, this Petition is allowed and the proceedings as

against the second Accused in C.C.No.166 of 2022 on the file of the

Judicial Magistrate / Fast Track Court (Magistrate level), Tuticorin is

quashed.

28.10.2022

Internet:Yes./No Index:Yes/no indu

To

1. The Judicial Magistrate / Fast Track Court (Magistrate level), Tuticorin.

2.The Government Advocate (Crl. Side), Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.15360 of 2022

SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.

indu

CRL.O.P (MD) No.15360 of 2022 and Crl.M.P(MD) Nos.10086 and 10088 of 2022

28.10.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter