Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.Rajendra Kumar vs The Sub Registrar
2022 Latest Caselaw 16915 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 16915 Mad
Judgement Date : 28 October, 2022

Madras High Court
K.Rajendra Kumar vs The Sub Registrar on 28 October, 2022
                                                                                 W.P.No.28522 of 2022



                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                                                  DATED: 28.10.2022
                                                          CORAM:
                                    THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
                                                  W.P.No.28522 of 2022


                            K.Rajendra Kumar                             . . . Petitioner


                                                              Vs.

                           The Sub Registrar,
                           Sebium Sub Registrar Office,
                           Perambur, Chennai-11                       . . . Respondent



                     PRAYER:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
                     to issue a Certiorarified Mandamus or any other order or direection inn the
                     form of Writ and Quash the refusal letter No.RFL/Sembium/18/2022 dated 6 th
                     October 2022 issued by the respondent and direct, the Sub Registrar, office
                     of the Sub Registrar of Sembium, Perambur, Chennai-11 to entertain the
                     petitioner's application to register the Settlement Deed executed by the
                     petitioner to his wife S.Rukmani residing at No.106-B, S.V.Puram,
                     Pattinapakam, Chennai-28.




                     1/6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                          W.P.No.28522 of 2022



                                        For Petitioners     : M/s.K.V.Subramanian Associates

                                        For Respondents : Mr.E.Vijay Anand,
                                                          Additional Government Pleader

                                                               ORDER

The present petition has been filed seeking to quash the impugned

refusal letter dated 6.10.2022 of the respondent and direct the respondent to

entertain the petitioner's application to register the settlement deed which was

executed by the petitioner to his wife.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that originally the property situated at

No.25/9, Sivalingam Street, Vetri Nagar, T.V.K. Nagar, Chennai-82 was

owned the petitioner's deceased mother namely Manohari ammal. After the

demise of his mother, the said property devolved upon the petitioner and he is

absolute possession and enjoyment of the same since the date of the death of

his mother. In order to settle the above said property in favour of his wife, the

petitioner had executed a Settlement deed dated 28.09.2022 in favour of wife

and placed the same for registration before the respondent herein, however,

the respondent had refused to register the same vide the impugned refusal

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.28522 of 2022

check slip, on the ground that the original document was not presented for

verification and the petitioner was asked to produce the Non-Traceable

certificate. However, the petitioner had lost the original parent documents of

the above said property, for which, the petitioner made a complaint to the law

enforcing agency, Mylapore which resulted in filing of CSR, however, the

paper publication was also issued in vernacular newspapers. Having left with

no other remedy, the petitioner has come up with the present petition seeking

to quash the impugned refusal check slip issued by the respondent herein.

3. Though very many grounds have been raised, learned counsel for the

petitioner submits that though the petitioner annexed the certified copy of the

parent document, even then the respondent refused to register the document

which is not sustainable and in support of his plea, learned counsel placed his

reliance upon the decision of this Court in W.P.No.1637 of 2020 dated

23.11.2020, in which, certain directions were given and the petitioner herein

may also be granted the same relief in the light of the above decision.

Accordingly, he prays for allowing this Writ Petition.

4. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.28522 of 2022

respondent submits that the document presented by the petitioner was

rejected by the respondent on the ground that parent document was not

annexed along with the document.

5. The issue involved in the present case is no longer res integra.

This Court, in W.P.(MD)No.19745 of 2020, order dated 11.02.2021, makes

it clear that, there is no need to present the parent document and that a

certified copy of the parent document is sufficient to entertain the document

for registration. The relevant portion of the above said order is extracted

hereunder:-

"8.This Court is entirely in agreement with the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner in this regard.

The latest decision of the learned Single Judge appears to have not considered the implication of the Circular with reference to the scheme of the relevant Act. On the other hand, the above three decisions cited on behalf of the petitioner would certainly hold the field and in which event, insistence on production of original Title Deeds by the Registering Authority is without any authority of law. The Circular issued by the Inspector General of Registration, Chennai in this regard cannot have any sanctity, unless the power of issuance of such Circular is authorized under the provisions of the Act. This Court has consistently held that no such power can be read into Act, in the absence of any specific provisions and in that view of the matter, as rightly contended by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the subject issue is no more res-integra. As far as the latest decision of the learned Single Judge is concerned,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.28522 of 2022

being a kind of a contra view, this Court is of the opinion that the order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(MD)No.16768 of 2020, dated 26.11.2020 has not appreciated the provisions of the Act, as the reasons of the learned Single Judge are contrary to the well considered earlier Judgments of this Court. The learned Judge has reasoned without any specific reference to the scheme of the Act, which governs the registration."

6. In view of the ratio laid down by this Court above, this writ petition

is allowed, the impugned order dated 06.10.2022 is set aside and the

respondent is directed to entertain the documents presented by the petitioner

and pass appropriate orders, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of

receipt of a copy of this order if it is otherwise in order and the petitioner is

directed to pay the requisite Stamp Duty and Registration Charges. No costs.

28.10.2022

NHS

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No

M.DHANDAPANI, J.

NHS

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.28522 of 2022

To

The Sub Registrar, Sebium Sub Registrar Office, Perambur, Chennai-11

W.P.No.28522 of 2022

28.10.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter