Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 16680 Mad
Judgement Date : 19 October, 2022
S.ANo.272 of 1996
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 19.10.2022
CORAM: JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE
S.A.No.272 of 1996
and C.M.P(MD)Nos.6002 to 6004 of 2019,
1106 to 1108 of 2020, 1112 to 1114 of 2020, 1109 to 1111 of 2020
1.Muthuvel Udayar
2. Kamalam
3. Alagappan (Died)
4. Subbiah (Died) ... Appellants/Appellants/Defendants 1,2,4 & 5
Vs.
1.P.Gopal
2.R.Ramaiah
3.V.Chinniah
4.Periyasamy
5.C.Raju
6.C.Perumal
7.V.Nalliah
8.N.Subramanian
9.Karuppiah
10.S.Govindan
11.A.Chelliah ... Respondents/Respondents/Plaintiffs
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure,
against the judgment and decree dated 28.09.1995 in A.S.No.23 of 1994 on
the file of the Sub Court, Devakottai confirming the judgement and decree
dated 17.09.1993 in O.S.No.547 of 1990 on the file of the District Munsif
Court, Devakottai.
For Appellants : Mrs.Parameshwari
for Mr.D.Panneerselvam
For R1 to R4, R8 to R11 : Mrs.AL.Gandhimathi
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.ANo.272 of 1996
JUDGMENT
This Second Appeal is of the year 1996, it was once dismissed and then
restored. Several applications were filed for impleading some legal heirs. It
is the suit for bare injunction regarding the pathway and the appellants
concurrently have suffered with the decree both before the trial court and
the First Appellate Court. Now after 26 years, the matter came up before
this Court this morning. When this Court perused the cause list, it found that
the applications were filed for condonation of delay in setting aside the
abatement for about 3000 days.
2. Given the scenario and given the facts that the appeal is pending for 26
years and the appellants are already defaulters once before this Court, this
Court informs Mrs.Parameshwari, learned counsel now on record for the
appellants that if the appellants deposit Rs.25,000/- as a pre-condition, they
may be permitted to serve notice on the other side. The learned counsel for
the appellants made a statement that she would obtain instruction from the
appellants in the matter and accordingly, the matter was adjourned till the
afternoon.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.ANo.272 of 1996
3. When the matter was taken up in the afternoon, the learned counsel
submitted that the appellants now intend to engage some senior counsel.
Nothing can be more farcical than what is now attempted before this Court
in a suit for bare injunction vis-a-vis the right of pathway pending for 26
years, to keep a case alive where the appellants show zero anxiety to
proceed with the case. All the Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are dismissed
and the Second Appeal is dismissed too as abated. No costs.
19.10.2022 Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No CM To,
1.The Subordinate Judge, Devakottai
2.The District Munsif, Devakottai.
3.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.ANo.272 of 1996
N.SESHASAYEE, J.,
CM
S.A.No.272 of 1996 and C.M.P(MD)Nos.6002 to 6004 of 2019, 1106 to 1108 of 2020, 1112 to 1114 of 2020, 1109 to 1111 of 2020
19.10.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!