Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 16501 Mad
Judgement Date : 17 October, 2022
Crl.O.P.No.25061 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.10.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM
Crl.O.P.No.25061 of 2022
S.Panneerselvam ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Commissioner of Police,
Avadi Police Commissionerate,
Avadi, Chennai 600 054.
2.The Station House Officer,
Manali Police Station,
Madhavaram District. ... Respondents
PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.,
to direct the respondents to file First Information Report on the complaint filed
by the petitioner in CSR No.224 of 2022 dated 07.07.2022 on the file of the
Manali Police Station, Madhavaram District within the time frame as may be
fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sridharan
For Respondent : Mr.S.Santhosh,
Government Advocate (crl.side)
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.25061 of 2022
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the
respondents to register First Information Report on the complaint filed by the
petitioner in CSR No.224 of 2022 dated 07.07.2022 on the file of the Manali
Police Station, Madhavaram District within the time frame as may be fixed by
this Court.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that
though the petitioner gave complaint against one Jayashankar and others on
07.07.2022, the respondent police has not registered the case till now.
Therefore, the respondent police may be directed to register the case, based on
the compliant given by the petitioner.
3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the
respondents submitted that, after receipt of complaint dated 07.07.2022 from
the petitioner, the respondent police gave CSR No.224 of 2022 and conducted
enquiry on CSR No.224 of 2022 and it is pending for further investigation.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.25061 of 2022
4. I have considered the matter in the light of the submissions made
by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate
(Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents.
5. The Division Bench of this Court in G.Prabhakaran v. The
Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur, reported in (2018) 2 LW Crl 489 and the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in its latest judgment rendered by a three Judge Bench
in M.Subramaniam v. S.Janaki, reported in (2020) 5 CTC 464, after relying
upon Sakiri Vasu's Case, has categorically held that the High Court cannot
issue any direction for registration of FIR. High Court can intervene only in
extraordinary circumstances and rare cases. However, taking note of the fact
that the complaint is now pending and not been enquired, the Investigation
officer is directed to issue notice to the parties and conduct enquiry as directed
by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of
Uttar Pradesh and others [2014 (2) SCC (1)]. If any cognizable offence is
made out, the respondent police is bound to register the FIR otherwise they may
close the complaint. Such exercise shall be completed within a period of four
weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.25061 of 2022
V.SIVAGNANAM,J.
shk
6. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is
disposed of.
17.10.2022
Internet:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non speaking order
shk
To
1.The Commissioner of Police, Avadi Police Commissionerate, Avadi, Chennai 600 054.
2.The Station House Officer, Manali Police Station, Madhavaram District.
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
Crl.O.P.No.25061 of 2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!