Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 16496 Mad
Judgement Date : 17 October, 2022
Crl.O.P.No.25000 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.10.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM
Crl.O.P.No.25000 of 2022
R.Sampathkumar ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Superintendent of Police,
Kancheepuram District,
Kancheepuram TK & DT.
2.The Inspector of Police,
Taluk Police Station,
Kancheepuram TK & DT. ... Respondents
PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.,
to direct the respondents 1 & 2 to register the petitioner complaints dated
14.06.2022 & 17.06.2022 in vide CSR No.2167 of 2022 and file a FIR.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.R.Shanmugam
For Respondent : Mr.S.Santhosh,
Government Advocate (crl.side)
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.25000 of 2022
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the
respondents 1 & 2 to register the petitioner complaints dated 14.06.2022 &
17.06.2022 in vide CSR No.2167 of 2022 and file a FIR.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that
though the petitioner gave seperate complaint against one Vijayakumar to the
respondents 1 & 2 on 14.06.2022 and 17.06.2022, they have not registered a
case till now. Therefore, the respondents police may be directed to register the
case, based on the compliants given by the petitioner.
3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the
respondents submitted that, after receipt of complaints dated 14.06.2022 and
17.06.2022 from the petitioner, the second respondent police conducted enquiry
in C.S.R No.2167 of 2022 and it is pending for further investigation.
4. I have considered the matter in the light of the submissions made
by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate
(Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.25000 of 2022
5. The Division Bench of this Court in G.Prabhakaran v. The
Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur, reported in (2018) 2 LW Crl 489 and the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in its latest judgment rendered by a three Judge Bench
in M.Subramaniam v. S.Janaki, reported in (2020) 5 CTC 464, after relying
upon Sakiri Vasu's Case, has categorically held that the High Court cannot
issue any direction for registration of FIR. High Court can intervene only in
extraordinary circumstances and rare cases. However, taking note of the fact
that the complaint is now pending and not been enquired, the Investigation
officer is directed to issue notice to the parties and conduct enquiry as directed
by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of
Uttar Pradesh and others [2014 (2) SCC (1)]. If any cognizable offence is
made out, the second respondent police is bound to register the FIR otherwise
they may close the complaint. Such exercise shall be completed within a period
of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
6. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is
disposed of.
17.10.2022
Internet:Yes/No shk
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.25000 of 2022
V.SIVAGNANAM,J.
shk
To
1.The Superintendent of Police, Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram TK & DT.
2.The Inspector of Police, Taluk Police Station, Kancheepuram TK & DT.
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
Crl.O.P.No.25000 of 2022
17.10.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!