Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S. Bhavam Engineering vs The State Of Tamilnadu
2022 Latest Caselaw 16440 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 16440 Mad
Judgement Date : 17 October, 2022

Madras High Court
M/S. Bhavam Engineering vs The State Of Tamilnadu on 17 October, 2022
                                                                         W.P. No. 17219 of 2015

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED : 17.10.2022

                                                     CORAM

                                  THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU

                                              W.P. No. 17219 of 2015
                                                       and
                                             M.P. Nos. 1 and 2 of 2015

                M/s. Bhavam Engineering
                Rep. By its Proprietor M.Venuraj
                Plot No.15, Old No.65-A
                SIDCO Industrial Estate
                Ambattur, Chennai – 600 058.                                      … Petitioner

                                                        -vs-

                1. The State of Tamilnadu
                   Rep. By the Secretary to Government
                   Micro, Small and Medium Industries Department
                   Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.

                2. The Managing Director
                   TANSIDCO
                   SIDCO Corporate Office Building
                   Thiru.Vi.Ka.Industrial Estate
                   Guindy, Chennai – 600 032.

                3. The Estate Manager
                   TANSIDCO Industrial Estate
                   Ambattur, Chennai – 600 058.

                4. M/s.Mani Industries
                   Rep. By its Managing Partner Arumuga Pandian
                   No.33, Annai Theresa St. Ayapakkam
                   Chennai – 600 077.                                       ...
                Respondents


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                1/8
                                                                                        W.P. No. 17219 of 2015

                Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950,
                praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Manadamus, Calling for the entire
                records pertaining to the order passed by the Estate Manager, TANSIDCO
                Industrial Estate, Ambattur, Chennai-58, the Third Respondent herein vide his
                proceedings No. RC. No. 3291/A7/86 dated 03.06.2015 and quash the same as
                illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable being violative of rules and principles of natural
                justice and thereby direct the respondents herein to assign an extent of 8322
                square feet of land and A.C. Sheeted Building to an extent of 3000 square feet
                situated at Plot No.15, Old No.65-A, SIDCO Industrial Estate, Ambattur,
                Chennai – 600 058 on receiving fair sale consideration as may be fixed by the
                respondents herein within a time frame fixed by the Court.

                                  For Petitioner      : Mr. A.R.Suresh

                                  For Respondents : Mr. J.Arunkumar (For R1)

                                                       Mr. M.J.Jaseem Mohamed (For R2 & R3)

                                                       R4-Not ready in notice


                                                         ORDER

Heard Mr. A.R.Suresh, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner,

Mr. J.Arunkumar, Learned Counsel for the First Respondent and

Mr. M.J.Jaseem Mohamed, Learned Counsel for the Second and Third

Respondents and perused materials placed on record, apart from the pleadings of

the parties.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P. No. 17219 of 2015

2. The Second Respondent by Order No. 44533/N2/74 dated 21.08.1974 had

allotted Plot No. 65-B of an extent of 0.50 acre of land to one G.Subramanian,

Proprietor, M/s. Mani Industries, who had failed to commence construction and

pay the entire costs for the land, which led to the cancellation of the allotment

made in his favour by Order No. 32026//N2/83 dated 21.06.1984 passed by the

Second Respondent. The said G.Subramanian had filed the suit in O.S. No. 1718

of 1997 before the District Munsif Court, Ambattur for permanent injunction

restraining the Third Respondent from disturbing his peaceful enjoyment, which

was dismissed by judgment and decree dated 28.10.2003. Further, the Writ

Petition in W.P. No. 2174 of 2003 filed by the said G.Subramanian to direct the

Third Respondent to execute sale deed in his favour, was dismissed as

withdrawn by order dated 16.12.2006 passed by the Court.

3. It is the case of the Petitioner that the said G.Subramanian had entered into

a Lease Deed dated 25.01.2005 registered as Document No. 183 of 2005 in the

office of the Sub-Registrar, Villivakkam granting lease of an extent of 8,322 sq.

ft. of land forming part of that plot (which had been allotted by the Second

Respondent to him) for a period of two years from 25.01.2005 to 24.01.2007 and

he has been paying rent to him. However, the said G.Subramanian died on

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P. No. 17219 of 2015

23.08.2006 during the subsistence of the said lease, but the Petitioner continued

to be in occupation of the said extent of land where he is said to have made

construction for his factory. When the Third Respondent by proceedings in RC.

No. 3291/A7/86 dated 03.06.2015 called upon the Petitioner to vacate from the

land occupied by him within 15 days, failing which further action would be taken

for resuming possession, the Petitioner has filed this Writ Petition challenging the

said order and has sought for a direction to the Respondents to assign an extent

of 8,322 sq. ft. of land and A.C. sheeted building to an extent of 3,000 sq. ft.

constructed therein at Plot No. 15, Old No. 65-A, SIDCO Industrial Estate,

Ambattur, Chennai – 600058 on receiving fair sale consideration as may be

determined by the Respondent within the time frame that may be stipulated by

the Court.

4. At this juncture, it must be recapitulated here that it is trite law that any

disposal of public property by the State or its instrumentalities partakes the

character of a trust and the methods to be adopted for its disposal must be fair

and transparent providing an opportunity to all the interested persons to

participate in the process. As such, any decision granting such allotment of the

public property to the Petitioner to suit his convenience just because he happens

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P. No. 17219 of 2015

to be in occupation of a part of the land as a lessee of the said G.Subramanian,

after the cancellation of the allotment in his favour, would be contrary to law and

defeat public interest, which cannot be countenanced. It would be evident that

neither the Petitioner has any legally enforceable right to claim transfer of the

public property by the Second and Third Respondents, nor the Second and Third

Respondents have any legal obligation to be compelled to take any decision in

favour of the Petitioner for granting the same to him.

5. When the aforesaid legal position was pointed out, Learned Counsel for

the Petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw this Writ Petition and he

has made an endorsement to that effect. However, Learned Counsel for the

Petitioner makes a fervent plea that four months may be granted for the Petitioner

to remove the machineries and vacate from the property and an affidavit dated

15.10.2022 has been filed by the Petitioner in that regard. That apart, it has been

brought to notice that by an order dated 17.06.2015 in M.P. No. 2 of 2015 in this

Writ Petition, the Petitioner was required to deposit a sum of Rs. 5,00,000/- to

the credit of the Third Respondent as condition for grant of interim stay of the

impugned order, but as the Third Respondent has not received the same, the

Petitioner has filed M.P. No. 3 of 2015 to direct the Third Respondent to accept

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P. No. 17219 of 2015

the said amount or permit the Petitioner to deposit that amount in this Court.

6. Having regard to the aforesaid submissions made, if the Petitioner makes

payment of the said amount of Rs. 5,00,000/- to the Third Respondent by

23.11.2022, the Second and Third Respondents shall defer the proceedings for

eviction of the Petitioner from the property till 31.12.2022 and the aforesaid

amount shall be treated as part payment towards damages for unauthorized

occupation in terms of Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Public Premises (Eviction of

Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971. It is also made clear that if the Petitioner is

otherwise eligible, he shall not be precluded from participating in any tender or

auction for future allotment of the said land by the Second and Third

Respondents.

In the result, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the

clarification that the Second and Third Respondents may take further action for

resuming possession of the land in occupation of the Petitioner on the aforesaid

terms following the prescribed procedure in accordance with law. Consequently,

the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No costs.

17.10.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P. No. 17219 of 2015

Maya Index: Yes/No Note: Issue order copy by 14.11.2022.

To

1. The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu Micro, Small and Medium Industries Department Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.

2. The Managing Director TANSIDCO SIDCO Corporate Office Building Thiru.Vi.Ka.Industrial Estate Guindy, Chennai – 600 032.

3. The Estate Manager TANSIDCO Industrial Estate Ambattur, Chennai – 600 058.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P. No. 17219 of 2015

P.D. AUDIKESAVALU, J.

Maya

W.P. No. 17219 of 2015

17.10.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter