Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 16422 Mad
Judgement Date : 14 October, 2022
W.P.No.33584 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14.10.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
W.P.No.33584 of 2014
N.Rani ..Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Tahsildar,
Taluk Office,
Tiruvannamalai Town.
2.Nanda @ Navaneetham
[R2 impleaded as per order dated 20.01.2015
in M.P.No.1 of 2014] ..Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
seeking issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records
of the respondent in Proceedings No.Na.Ka.A1/5594/2014 dated
28.03.2014 and to quash the same and further direct the respondent herein
to issue the legal heir certificate to the petitioner and her children viz.,
Nirmala, Saravanan and Karthikeyan.
For Petitioner : Mrs.S.Radha Gopalan
For Respondents : Mr.Vadivelu Deenadayalan,
Additional Government Pleader for R1
Mr.K.Venkatasubban
for M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates for R2
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.33584 of 2014
ORDER
The petitioner is aggrieved by the rejection of the request of grant
of legal heirship certificate recognizing her as the legal heir of her husband
Natarajan, who died on 24.02.2014.
2. The request of the petitioner has been rejected on the ground
that Natarajan has got two wives therefore the legal heirship certificate
cannot be issued.
3. Mrs.S.Radha Gopalan, learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner would vehemently contend that the civil Court has found that the
petitioner is the legally wedded wife and the objector viz., Nanda @
Navaneetham is not the legally wedded wife of the deceased Natarajan.
4. In view of the judgement of the Full Bench of this Court in
P.Venkatachalam Vs. The Tahsildar, Kumarapalayam Taluk dated
17.06.2022 in W.P.No.25247 of 2021 etc., batch, rejection or grant of legal
heirship certificate does not affect the rights of a person to succeed to ones
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.33584 of 2014
estate. It has been held that the legal heirship certificate issued by the
Tahsildar is only an evidence of relationship and it will neither confer rights
or take away subsisting rights.
5. In the case on hand, the petitioner has already been declared as
a legally wedded wife of Natarajan by the civil Court. Therefore, the
Authorities should act upon the production of the judgment of the civil Court
and not insist upon the wasteful exercise of obtaining the legal heirship
certificate.
6. Therefore, the writ petition is closed with an observation that
the rejection of the claim for legal heirship certificate will not affect the
rights of the petitioner which have been recognized by the civil Court and the
Authorities shall act on the production of the judgment of the civil Court
without insisting on the legal heirship certificate. No costs.
14.10.2022
dsa
Index : Yes/No
Internet : Yes/No
Speaking order/Non-Speaking order
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.33584 of 2014
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
dsa
To
The Tahsildar,
Taluk Office,
Tiruvannamalai Town.
W.P.No.33584 of 2014
14.10.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!