Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Muthu Meenakshi @ S.Swathi vs Muthaiyah @ Seenivasan
2022 Latest Caselaw 16419 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 16419 Mad
Judgement Date : 14 October, 2022

Madras High Court
Muthu Meenakshi @ S.Swathi vs Muthaiyah @ Seenivasan on 14 October, 2022
                                                                            TR.C.M.P(MD).No.377 of 2022


                         BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                    DATED : 14.10.2022

                                                         CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

                                              TR.C.M.P(MD).No.377 of 2022
                                                         and
                                               C.M.P(MD).No.6228 of 2022

                     Muthu Meenakshi @ S.Swathi                              ... Petitioner

                                                           versus

                     Muthaiyah @ Seenivasan                                   ... Respondent


                                  Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24
                     of C.P.C to withdraw O.P.No.176 of 2022 pending on the file of the
                     Family Court, Sivagangai and transfer the same to the file of the
                     Family Court, Trichy.


                                        For Petitioner        : Mr.K.M.Karunakaran
                                        For Respondent        : Mr.C.Rajagopal




                     1/6



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                             TR.C.M.P(MD).No.377 of 2022




                                                           ORDER

This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking

transfer of the case in O.P.No.176 of 2022 from the file of the Family

Court, Sivagangai, to the file of the Family Court, Trichy.

2. The petitioner herein was a divorcee and she is having a 6

year-old female child. After knowing all the facts, the marriage

between the petitioner and the respondent was solemnized on

09.12.2021, as per the Hindu Rites and Customs. After the marriage,

the petitioner was not allowed to look after her child and she was also

ill-treated by the respondent and his family members. Therefore, she

left the matrimonial home. Thereafter, the respondent has filed

O.P.No.176 of 2022 before the Family Court, Sivagangai, for divorce.

Now, the petitioner and her 6-year-old female child are living along

with her old-aged parents at Trichy. Since the petitioner alone has to

take care of child and her old-aged parents, she finds it difficult to

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TR.C.M.P(MD).No.377 of 2022

travel from Trichy to Sivagangai. Hence, she filed the present Transfer

Civil Miscellaneous Petition to transfer the case in O.P.No.176 of 2022

from the file of the Family Court, Sivagangai, to the file of the Family

Court, Trichy.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that

the distance between Trichy and Sivagangai is around 140 kms. He

further submits that the petitioner is not having sufficient means to

travel and she depends upon her parents to meet out her day-to-day

expenses. Since she alone has to take care of her child and her parents

and there is no one to accompany her, she finds it difficult to travel

from Trichy to Sivagangai for appearing before the Family Court,

Sivagangai, for each and every hearing.

4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

5. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Amitha Shah vs-

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TR.C.M.P(MD).No.377 of 2022

Virendar Lal Shah, reported (2003)10 SCC 609) has held that the

convenience of the wife and more so of the child must be taken into

account while deciding the petition for transfer and in the case of

Rajani Kishor Paradeshi Vs Kishor Babulal Paradeshi reported in

(2005) 12 SCC 237, the Hon'ble Apex Court has held that in such type

of transfer petitions, the convenience of the wife is to be preferred over

the convenience of the husband.

6. This Court being satisfied with the reasons stated in the

affidavit filed in support of this petition and also taking into

consideration that the convenience of wife is to be taken into

consideration at the time of considering transfer petitions as held by the

Hon'ble Supreme Court in the judgments cited supra, is inclined to

allow the present petition.

7. In the light of the above, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous

petition stands allowed. The proceedings in O.P.No.176 of 2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TR.C.M.P(MD).No.377 of 2022

pending on the file of the Family Court, Sivagangai, is withdrawn and

ordered to be transferred to the file of the Family Court, Trichy. The

Family Court, Sivagangai, is directed to transmit the entire case records

to the Family Court, Trichy, forthwith. The learned Judge, Family

Court, Trichy, shall dispose of the case as expeditiously as possible. No

costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

14.10.2022

Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes / No ogy

To

1. The Family Court, Sivagangai.

2. The Family Court, Trichy.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis TR.C.M.P(MD).No.377 of 2022

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

ogy

TR.C.M.P(MD).No.377 of 2022

14.10.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter