Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The President vs G.Selvi
2022 Latest Caselaw 16366 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 16366 Mad
Judgement Date : 14 October, 2022

Madras High Court
The President vs G.Selvi on 14 October, 2022
                                                                                  W.A.No.2282 of 2022

                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                       DATED: 14.10.2022

                                                              CORAM

                                       The Hon'ble Mr. Justice PARESH UPADHYAY
                                                            and
                                  The Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

                                                    W.A.No.2282 of 2022
                                                            and
                                                  C.M.P. No.17416 of 2022
                     The President,
                     Villipakkam Primary Agriculture Cooperative
                            Credit Society, Villipakkam Village,
                     Soonampedu Post, Cheyyur Taluk,
                     Chengalpet District – 603 401.                               .. Appellant

                                                                vs

                     1.G.Selvi

                     2.The Joint Registrar of Co-operative
                          Societies/Revision Authority,
                       Kancheepuram Zone, Kancheepuram.                              .. Respondents



                                  Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order
                     dated 21.09.2021 in W.P.No.20139 of 2021.


                                       For Appellant      :      Mr.P.Dinesh Kumar

                                       For Respondents :         Mr.Balan Haridas for R1
                                                                 Mr.M.Rajendran,
                                                                 Addl. Govt. Pleader for R2




                     Page 1 of 5


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                            W.A.No.2282 of 2022



                                                       JUDGMENT

(Delivered by PARESH UPADHYAY.,J)

1. Challenge in this appeal is made to the order dated

21.09.2021 recorded on W.P. No.20139 of 2021. This appeal is by the

second respondent in the writ petition.

2. Learned advocate for the appellant has submitted that,

once the direction contained in the order of learned Single Judge is

complied with, it would be very difficult for the appellant to recover

the amount which is already quantified to be recovered from the

husband of the writ petitioner and therefore the order be interfered

with.

3. Having heard learned advocate for the appellant and

having considered the material on record this Court finds that, this is

a second round of litigation. The husband of the writ petitioner had

died on 01.08.2019 and none of the terminal dues, even gratuity and

provident fund were paid for simple reason of pendency of some

surcharge proceedings and therefore by filing W.P.No.9169 of 2021,

grievance was voiced. This Court directed the State Authorities to

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.2282 of 2022

pass appropriate order in accordance with law. That order has

subsequently been passed by the Joint Registrar of Co-operative

Societies/ Revisional Authority under the Act on 19.05.2021 by which

it was directed that, the terminal dues of the deceased employee /

husband of the writ petitioner shall be paid. So far recovery aspect is

concerned, it was left to the appellant / second respondent employer

to take recourse to other remedies available under law. It is this

order, which binds the second respondent, which it has not

challenged, and which was sought to be enforced by the writ

petitioner/ widow and for that purpose also she was constrained to

approach this Court again by filing W.P. No.20139 of 2021.

3.1 We find that it was very harsh to expect the widow to

seek mandamus from this Court to get the order passed by the State

authorities implemented through the State Authorities. In any case

that order is now passed by learned single Judge against the State

Authorities to get the order passed by it implemented. The State is

not in appeal and rightly so.

3.2 We note that the State cannot be heard contending its

helplessness to get its order implemented. Needful therefore needs to

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.2282 of 2022

be done by the State Authorities.

4. We do not find any infirmity in the order of learned single

Judge. This appeal therefore needs to be dismissed.

5. For the reasons recorded above, this appeal is dismissed.

No costs. However by recording simple dismissal of this appeal the

widow need not be left in lurch.

6. List on 07.11.2022 for reporting compliance of the order

passed by the State Authorities dated 19.05.2021 and the order of

learned single Judge dated 21.09.2021.

(P.U., J) (D.B.C., J) 14.10.2022 Index:No mmi/6

To

The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies/Revision Authority, Kancheepuram Zone, Kancheepuram.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.2282 of 2022

PARESH UPADHYAY, J.

and D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.

mmi

W.A.No.2282 of 2022

14.10.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter