Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

D.Ramkumar vs M.M.S.Roadlines
2022 Latest Caselaw 16169 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 16169 Mad
Judgement Date : 12 October, 2022

Madras High Court
D.Ramkumar vs M.M.S.Roadlines on 12 October, 2022
                                                                            C.M.A.No.2227 of 2019

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED: 12.10.2022

                                                      CORAM:

                                     THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T.ASHA

                                               C.M.A.No.2227 of 2019

                  D.Ramkumar                                            ... Appellant

                                                       vs.

                  1.M.M.S.Roadlines,
                  No.44, Bajanaikoil Street,
                  Pudupalayam & Post,
                  Gobichettipalayam Taluk,
                  Erode District.
                  (R1 set ex-parte before the tribunal,
                  Hence notice may be dispensed with)

                  2.Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd.,
                  Kirusti Mahal, Second Floor,
                  New No.41, Eigth Street,
                  Tatabath, Coimbatore-641 012.                              ... Respondents

                  PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the
                  Motor Vehicles Act, against the Order and Decreetal order in
                  M.C.O.P.No.288 of 2011 dated 21.01.2013 on the file of the Motor
                  Accident Claims Tribunal / Sub-Ordinate Judge, Sathyamangalam.
                                    For Appellant     : Mr.S.Kamadevan
                                    For Respondents   : Mr.E.Rajadurai
                                                        for M/s.M.B.Gopalan Associates [R2]
                                                        R1 – Ex-parte

                  1/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                               C.M.A.No.2227 of 2019



                                             JUDGMENT

The petitioner before the Tribunal has filed this appeal seeking

enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims

Tribunal, Sub-Ordinate Judge, Sathyamangalam in M.C.O.P.No.288 of

2011.

2. The brief facts are as follows:

The appellant herein had filed the above claim petition seeking

compensation of a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- for the injuries sustained by him

in a road accident on 04.05.2011. It is the contention of the appellant that

on the said date at about 0.30 hrs., the appellant was travelling in a Tata

Indica Vista Car bearing Reg.No.TN-36-M-6868. The car was driven by

one Sakthivel and the appellant was travelling in the car along with

Chinnasamy, Gopal @ Marimuthu from Bangalore to Gobichettipalayam.

When the vehicle had reached Gobichettipalayam-Adhani main road, near

Thottipalayam junction, the driver of the Car drove the same in a rash and

negligent manner, as a result of which, he lost control of the vehicle and

that the car hit the tree on the right side. The driver lost his life on the spot

and the appellant and the others had sustained grievous injuries and they

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2227 of 2019

were admitted at Gobichettipalayan Government Hospital. Chinnasamy was

declared dead on arrival at the hospital and the appellant and the other

passenger Gopal @ Marimuthu were given first aid treatment and

thereafter, the appellant was admitted to the Ganga Medical Centre &

Hospital (P) Ltd., Coimbatore. The appellant would submit that he is 50

years of age, working as sales representative in Maruthi Bus body building

Coach and earning a monthly income of Rs.30,000/-. By reason of the

accident, he had sustained a closed Tibia fracture in his left leg, closed both

bones segmental fracture in right leg.

3. The 1st respondent / owner of the vehicle remained exparte and it

was the 2nd respondent/Insurance Corporation which had contested the

claim petition. The 2nd respondent/Insurance Company had put the appellant

to strict proof of the contention in the claim statement which includes his

age, income and occupation. The 2nd respondent had also raised the doubt as

to whether the vehicle had a proper insurance cover, fitness certificate and

the driver of the vehicle had a valid driving licence at the time of accident.

4. The Tribunal below had considered the evidence both oral and

documentary and held that the accident had occurred only on account of the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2227 of 2019

negligence on the part of the deceased driver of the car. Thereafter, taking

into account the injuries sustained by the appellant and its nature, the

Tribunal had awarded a sum of Rs.3,63,425/- as compensation.

5. Since the appellant's injuries has not caused any loss of earning or

impairment in his functioning, the Tribunal has calculated the

compensation for disability by adopting the percentage method. Aggrieved

by the award passed by the Tribunal below, the appellant is before this

Court seeking enhancement.

6. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant would

submit that despite the injuries sustained and the disability assessed by the

doctor who was examined as PW2, the Tribunal had granted compensation

only by percentage method, whereas, the Tribunal ought to have granted the

compensation by adopting multiplier method. That apart, the Tribunal has

only taken a sum of Rs.4,500/- to be the salary of the appellant despite he

producing Ex.P10-Salary Certificate, wherein, his employer has given

certificate that he was earning a salary of Rs.12,500/- p.m.

7. The learned counsel for the 2nd respondent/Insurance Company on

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2227 of 2019

the other hand would submit that the Tribunal has taken into account all

the relevant factors and passed a reasonable award which does not require

any modification.

8. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials

on record.

9. The accident had taken place in the year 2011. The appellant has

marked Ex.P10 Salary Certificate and the same has not been seriously

objected by the 2nd respondent/Insurance Company. The Tribunal has only

taken a sum of Rs.2,000/- per percentage to calculate the compensation for

disability, the same can be enhanced to Rs.3,000/- per percentage, taking

into account the year and nature of injuries. Therefore, the amount under

the head of disability @ 30% would be Rs.90,000/-. Further, the appellant

has produced Ex.P10 Salary Certificate to show his salary, no doubt the

same has been marked through the witness himself and could be construed

as the document created for the purpose of the case. However, the appellant

would atleast have earned a minimum of Rs.6,000/- p.m. Therefore, the

amount under the head of loss of earning for six months would be

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2227 of 2019

Rs.36,000/- (Rs.6000/- X 6). In all other aspects, the award of the Tribunal

appears to be very reasonable and I see no reason to interfere with the same.

Therefore, the Compensation awarded by the Tribunal is reworked as

below:

                      S.No.          Description       Amount            Amount          Award
                                                      awarded by       awarded by      confirmed
                                                       Tribunal         this Court          or
                                                                                       enhanced
                                                                                       or granted
                                                                                       or reduced
                          1       Pain and           Rs.   45,000/- Rs.    45,000/- Confirmed
                                  Sufferings
                          2       Attender Charges Rs.     18,000/- Rs.    18,000/- Confirmed
                          3       Extra              Rs.    9,000/- Rs.     9,000/- Confirmed
                                  Nourishment
                          4       Transportation     Rs.   2,000/-   Rs.   2,000/-    Confirmed
                          5       Medical Expenses Rs. 2,02,425/-    Rs. 2,02,425/-   Confirmed
                          6       Loss of income for Rs. 27,000/-    Rs. 36,000/-     Enhanced
                                  six months
                          7       Permanent          Rs. 60,000/-    Rs. 90,000/-     Enhanced
                                  disability @ 30%
                                      TOTAL          Rs. 3,63,425/- Rs.4,02,425/-


5. In the result, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is allowed and the

compensation of Rs.3,63,425/- awarded by the Tribunal is hereby Enhanced

to a sum of Rs.4,02,425/-. Therefore, the 2nd respondent / Insurance

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2227 of 2019

Company is directed to deposit the enhanced amount of Rs.4,02,425/- to

the credit of M.C.O.P.No.288 of 2011 on the file of the Motor Accident

Claims Tribunal, Sub-Ordinate Judge, Sathyamangalam, together with

interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of claim petition till the date of

deposit and costs, less, the amount, if any already deposited, within a period

of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this Judgement. On such

deposit being made, the claimant is permitted to withdraw the amount now

determined by this Court, as apportioned by the Tribunal, along with

interest and costs, after adjusting the amount, if any already withdrawn, by

filing necessary application before the Tribunal. The claimant is directed to

pay the Court fee for the enhanced compensation amount, if required. The

Tribunal below shall not disburse the enhanced amount till such time as the

certified copy showing proof of payment of Court fee has been produced by

the claimant. No costs.

12.10.2022 Index : Yes/No Speaking / Non-speaking order ssn

P.T.ASHA, J.,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2227 of 2019

ssn

To:

1. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sub-Ordinate Judge, Sathyamangalam.

2. The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court of Madras, Chennai.

C.M.A.No.2227 of 2019

12.10.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter