Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 16009 Mad
Judgement Date : 10 October, 2022
C.M.A.No.2306 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10.10.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA
C.M.A.No.2306 of 2017
Goribee (died)
1. Shameem
2. Haseena
3. K. Hussain Basha .. Appellants
-Vs.-
1. B. Shanmugam
2. Reliance General Insurance Company Limited,
“Heavitree”, Unit No.1, 3rd Floor,
No.23, Spur Tank Road, Chetpet,
Chennai 600 031.
3. Parasamal Bothra ...Respondents
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor
Vehicles Act, against the decree and judgment dated 20.07.2016 made in
M.C.O.P.No.2733 of 2009 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims
Tribunal, (Special Sub Court No.1), Chennai.
For Appellant : Mr.K. Varadha Kamaraj
For Respondent-1 : Mr.S.Udayakumar
For Respondent-2 : Mr.S.Arun Kumar
For Respondent-3 : Served – No Appearance
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.No.2306 of 2017
JUDGMENT
The petitioners have filed this appeal seeking enhancement of the
Award granted by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Special Sub Court
No.1), Chennai in M.C.O.P.No.2733 of 2009.
2. The petitioners are the daughters, daughter-in-law and grand
son of one Kulsumbi, a 70 year old lady, who is said to have died in a road
traffic accident. The first petitioner, Goribee had died pending the claim
petition before the Tribunal. The petitioners had sought for a compensation
of a sum of Rs.8,00,000/-.
3. The Tribunal below had arrived at a compensation of a sum of
Rs.2,00,000/- and the same is questioned before this Court as being
inadequate.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants and the learned
counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2 and perused the
materials available on record.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2306 of 2017
5. The deceased is aged about 70 years and further, the
appellants/petitioners are not dependent on the deceased. The appellants 3
and 4 are the wife and the son of the deceased Kulsumbi' son, Khader Basha
and therefore, they are not dependents of the deceased. The Insurance
Company has not challenged the Award. The Tribunal, by adopting a
notional income of Rs.3,500/- per month and a multiplier of 5 has granted a
compensation of a sum of Rs.1,40,000/- under the head of loss of income.
The Award appears to be very reasonable and I see no reason to enhance the
same. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed. No costs.
10.10.2022
srn
To
1. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, (Special Sub Court No.1), Chennai.
2. The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.2306 of 2017
P.T.ASHA, J.,
srn
C.M.A.No.2306 of 2017
10.10.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!