Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

B.Latha vs T.Rajaram
2022 Latest Caselaw 16007 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 16007 Mad
Judgement Date : 10 October, 2022

Madras High Court
B.Latha vs T.Rajaram on 10 October, 2022
                                                                                   Crl.R.C.No.900 of 2018

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED:       10.10.2022

                                                         CORAM:

                             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

                                                CRL.R.C.No.900 of 2018

                B.Latha                                                              ... Petitioner

                                                          Vs.

                T.Rajaram                                                            ... Respondent

                Prayer: The Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Code of
                Criminal Procedure to set aside the order dated 12.07.2018 passed in
                C.A.No.124 of 2016 on the file of the III Additional District and Sessions Judge,
                Tiruppur, Dharapuram, related with order dated 07.11.2016 passed in
                C.C.No.135 of 2013 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court No.I,
                Udumalpet.

                                        For Petitioner     : Mr.M.Balaji

                                        For Respondent     : Mr.M.N.Balakrishnan


                                                      ORDER

This petition has been filed to to set aside the order dated 12.07.2018

passed in C.A.No.124 of 2016 on the file of the III Additional District and

Sessions Judge, Tiruppur, Dharapuram, related with order dated 07.11.2016

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.R.C.No.900 of 2018

passed in C.C.No.135 of 2013 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate

Court No.I, Udumalpet.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for

the respondent and perused the materials available on record.

3. The Criminal Revision Petition has been filed arising out of the

judgment passed in C.A.No.124 of 2016 dated 12.07.2018 on the file of the III

Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruppur, Tharapuram, thereby reversed

the finding of the trial Court order dated 07.11.2016 passed in C.C.No.135 of

2013, thereby acquitted the petitioner for the offence under Section 138 of

Negotiable Instruments Act.

4. This Court, while suspending the sentence imposed by the first

Appellate Court, directed the petitioner to deposit the entire cheque amount to

the credit of C.C.No.135 of 2013, within a period of two weeks. Accordingly,

the petitioner had deposited the entire cheque amount of Rs.1,90,000/- to the

credit of C.C.No.135 of 2013, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I,

Udumalpet, on 20.09.2018 itself.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.R.C.No.900 of 2018

5. Now, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he has no

objection to withdraw the cheque amount deposited by the respondent herein

and the respondent also has no objection to receive the said amount and set

aside the sentence imposed by the first Appellate Court.

6. In this regard, it is relevant to rely upon the full bench Judgment of this

Court reported in 2020 (4) CTC 1, in the case of “K.Rajalingam Vs

R.Suganthalakshmi” and batch, held that, in the cases, where, the Sessions

Court has reversed the order of acquittal passed by the Magistrate and the same

has been challenged by the accused before this Court by way of revision petition

and the same is pending, the same should be treated as an appeal pending before

this Court against the order of acquittal passed by the Magistrate, by

disregarding the order passed by the Sessions Court. In all those cases, the

complainant must file a transpose petition and the Registry must convert the

same as Criminal Appeals by showing the complainant as the Appellant and the

accused as the respondent. The Memorandum of grounds of Criminal Appeal

filed before the Sessions Court will be considered as the memorandum of

grounds of appeal in the renumbered Criminal Appeal.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.R.C.No.900 of 2018

7. In view of the above, the order of conviction dated 12.07.2018 in

C.A.No.124 of 2016 on the file of the III Additional District and Sessions Judge,

Tiruppur, Dharapuram is hereby set aside. The respondent is permitted to

withdraw the amount deposited to the credit of C.C.No.135 of 2013, on the file

of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Udumalpet, by filing an appropriate

application.

8. Accordingly, the criminal revision petition stands allowed.

10.10.2022 Index : Yes / No Speaking / Non Speaking order ata

To

1.The III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruppur, Dharapuram.

2.The Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Udumalpet.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.R.C.No.900 of 2018

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

ata

Crl.R.C.No.900 of 2018

10.10.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter