Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

S.K.Raj Kumar vs The Director Of Medical Education
2022 Latest Caselaw 9292 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9292 Mad
Judgement Date : 12 May, 2022

Madras High Court
S.K.Raj Kumar vs The Director Of Medical Education on 12 May, 2022
                                                                                     W.A.No.1336 of 2022

                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                     DATED : 12.05.2022

                                                           CORAM :

                           THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
                                              and
                     THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

                                                     W.A.No.1336 of 2022
                                                            and
                                                    C.M.P.No.8505 of 2022

                     S.K.Raj Kumar
                     S/o.V.Senthil Kumar                                                ... Appellant

                                                              Vs.

                     1.The Director of Medical Education,
                       No.162, Kilpauk,
                       Poonamallee High Road,
                       Chennai – 600 010.

                     2.The Dean,
                       Government Dharmapuri Medical College,
                       Dharmapuri.                                               ... Respondents

                     Prayer:

                                  Writ appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent praying to set

                     aside the order dated 24.01.2022 made in W.P.No.534 of 2022 and to allow

                     the above writ appeal.

                     Page 1 of 6



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                            W.A.No.1336 of 2022

                                        For Appellant         :       Mr.C.Prabakaran
                                        For Respondents       :       Mr.D.Ravichandran
                                                                      Special Government Pleader

                                                        JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by G.R.SWAMINATHAN ,J.)

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant and the learned

Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

2. The petitioner was undergoing M.B.B.S course in the second

respondent College. He was accused of having committed the act of

ragging, therefore, punitive action was taken. Challenging the same, the

petitioner filed W.P.No.534 of 2022, and the said writ petition was

dismissed, vide order dated 24.01.2022. Aggrieved by the same, this appeal

has been filed. It has been brought to our notice that similarly placed

students filed W.P.No.3720 of 2022 and the same was disposed of on

14.03.2022 in the following terms:

''3. That apart, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader and Mr.Jayaprakash, learned Government Advocate fairly brings to the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.1336 of 2022

notice of the Court that the Notification issued by the National Medical Commission dated 18.11.2021, at clause 24 dealing with the Institutional Administrative and Penal Actions, sets out a slew of punitive actions that may be imposed by the College, that read as follows:~

-(5). The nature of punitive actions that may be decided shall include the following, but shall not be limited to one or more of these actions that may be imposed, as deemed fit, namely:~

(i) Suspension from attending classes and academic privileges.

(ii) Withholding or withdrawing scholarship or fellowship and other benefits.

(iii) Debarring from appearing in any test or examination or other evaluation processes.

(iv) Withholding results.

(v) Debarring from attending conferences, and other academic programmes.

(vi) Debarring from representing the institution in any regional, national or international meet, tournament, youth festival, etc.

(vii) Suspension or expulsion from the hostel.

(viii) Imposition of a fine ranging from twenty~five thousand rupees to one lakh rupees.

(ix) Cancellation of admission.

(x) Rustication from the medical college or institution for a period ranging from one to four semesters.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.1336 of 2022

(xi) Expulsion from the medical colleges or institutions and consequent debarring from admission to any other institution for a specific period.-

4. They would thus have no objection to the petitioners making a representation before the college and, in such an event, for the authorities considering the same and exercising discretion, if they believe it is appropriate, for reduction of the punishment of suspension to any other punishment that would not attract the rigor of Rule 7. I concur with the suggestion made. The students are permitted to make such representation/application and the authorities are at discretion to consider the same on the merits.

5. If they believe that the punishment is to be reduced to any other punishment barring suspension, let them do so, by way of a speaking order passed in that regard. All safeguards shall be put in place in the event that the college is inclined to adopt this course of action including that, the students stay off campus and commute as day scholars.

6. This order is passed solely with a view to ensure that there is no disruption to the education of the students. Even assuming that the college is inclined to accept the representations, if any, filed, the criminal case will proceed as per Law and the only benefit obtained by the students under this order is an exemption from the rigor of Rule

7. This writ petition is disposed in the above terms. Consequently, connected writ miscellaneous petitions are also closed. There shall be no order as to costs.''

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.1336 of 2022

3. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant wants this Court to

pass the very same directions.

4. We notice that the National Medical Commission Regulations were

not brought to the notice of the learned single Judge while passing the order

in the writ petition. Therefore, the impugned order is set aside and the Writ

Appeal is disposed of by permitting the appellant to make a representation

before the second respondent. The second respondent shall pass appropriate

orders thereon within a period of two weeks, after receipt of the

representation from the appellant.

5. The Writ Appeal is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

[G.R.S, J.] [S.K.R, J.] 12.05.2022 Note : Issue Order Copy on 16.05.2022

Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order ms/mk

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.1336 of 2022

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

and SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.

ms/mk

To

1.The Director of Medical Education, No.162, Kilpauk, Poonamallee High Road, Chennai – 600 010.

2.The Dean, Government Dharmapuri Medical College, Dharmapuri.

W.A.No.1336 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.8505 of 2022

12.05.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter