Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5828 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 March, 2022
W.A.No.684 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 22.03.2022
Coram:
THE HONOURABLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, Chief Justice
and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
---
W.A.No.684 of 2022
and
C.M.P.No.4754 of 2022
---
Indian Public School (P) Ltd.,
Represented by its Chairman A.Ashokkumar,
Sathy Road, Sarkkar Samakkulam Po.,
Coimbatore. .. Appellant
Vs.
1. Assistant Divisional Engineer (C & M),
Highways Department,
Annur, Coimbatore District.
2. Divisional Engineer,
Highways Department, Coimbatore-18.
3. The Superintending Engineer,
Office of Highways Department,
Coimbatore-641 018. .. Respondents
Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order
dated 06.12.2021 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.23342 of 2014
on the file of this Court.
Page No.1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.684 of 2022
For appellant : Mr.Prahalad K.Bhat
JUDGMENT
(The Judgment of the Court was delivered by The Hon'ble Chief Justice)
The Writ Appeal has been filed to challenge the order dated 06.12.2021,
whereby, the Writ Petition preferred by the appellant/writ petitioner was
disposed of with liberty. The Writ Petition was filed against the order dated
24.07.2014 and to seek direction to forbear the respondents from removing the
foot over-bridge at 0/8 km in Devampalayam to Pethanaickenpalayam
Highways.
2. The appellant/writ petitioner failed to show the approval of the
authority for raising foot over-bridge and accordingly, a direction was given to
remove it. The writ petitioner has already removed the foot over-bridge, yet,
filed the present appeal and now, the only direction sought is that if they pursue
the application to seek approval/permission to construct the foot over-bridge, the
respondents may consider it as per the provisions of law. In that case, the
petitioner is not required to press the present Writ Appeal.
3. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the
Page No.2/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.684 of 2022
appellant, we do not find a case to cause interference in the impugned order.
However, the Writ Appeal is disposed of, with liberty to the appellant/writ
petitioner to pursue the application seeking approval/permission of the
construction of the foot over-bridge. In that case, the authorities would consider
the matter in accordance with law. However, this direction may not be construed
to mean that a positive direction is issued for grant of permission/approval,
rather, it is to be analysed by the authority concerned. No costs. Consequently,
C.M.P. is closed.
(M.N.B., CJ) (D.B.C.J)
22.03.2022
Index: Yes/no
Speaking Order: Yes/no
cs
To
1. The Assistant Divisional Engineer (C & M), Highways Department, Annur, Coimbatore District.
2. The Divisional Engineer, Highways Department, Coimbatore-18.
3. The Superintending Engineer, Office of Highways Department, Coimbatore-641 018.
Page No.3/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.684 of 2022
THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE and D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
cs
W.A.No.684 of 2022
22.03.2022
Page No.4/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!