Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4850 Mad
Judgement Date : 10 March, 2022
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 10.03.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.ANANTHI
C.R.P.(MD)No.1498 of 2021
and
C.M.P.(MD)No.8268 of 2021
K.Vijayaragavan ... Petitioner/Respondent/Respondent/
Defendant[Judgment Debtor]
Vs.
M.Durairaj ...Respondent/Petitioner/Petitioner/
Plaintiff [Decree Holder]
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure
Code, to call for the records pertaining to the Fair and Decreetal order dated
16.08.2021 in E.A.No.2 of 2021 in E.P.No.201 of 2016 in O.S.No.92 of 2010
on the file of the learned Additional District Judge, Dindigul and set aside the
same.
For Petitioner :Mr.S.Vikram
For Respondent :Mr.V.Sukumar
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the order,
dated 16.08.2021 in E.A.No.2 of 2021 in E.P.No.201 of 2016 in O.S.No.92 of
2010 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Dindigul.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2.The parties are referred to as per the rank mentioned before the Court
below.
3.The Plaintiff/Decree Holder has filed an application in E.A.No.2 of
2021 in E.P.No.201 of 2016 under Order 21 Rule 66 and Section 151 of Civil
Procedure Code and C.R.P. Rule 199(2) to reduce the upset price from
Rs.40,00,000/-[Rupees Forty Lakhs Only] to Rs.35,00,000/-[Rupees Thirty
Five Lakhs Only]. The said petition was allowed on 16.08.2021. Aggrieved
over the same, the revision petitioner/ defendant/Judgment Debtor is before
this Court.
4.Heard on either side. Perused the material documents available on
record.
5.The revision petitioner/Judgment Debtor has filed an application
under Order 21 rule 66 and Section 151 of Civil Procedure Code and C.R.P.
Rule 199(2) in E.A.No.2 of 2021 in E.P.No.201 of 2016 in O.S.No.92 of
2010 to reduce the upset price from Rs.40,00,000/-to Rs.35,00,000/-. The
decree was passed in the year 2016. Till now, the revision
petitioner/Judgment debtor has not deposited the decree amount. So, his https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
property came for an auction sale and no bitter was available for the fixed
upset price of Rs.40,00,000/-[Rupees Forty Lakhs Only]. So, the upset price
was reduced in to Rs.35,00,000/-[Rupees Thirty Five Lakhs Only].
6.The total extent of the property is 52 cents and the upset price was
reduced into Rs.35,00,000/-[Rupees Thirty Five Lakhs Only], is not
reasonable. Since no bitter is available it can be reduced into Rs.37,00,000/-
[Rupees Thirty Seven Lakhs Only]. Hence, the Execution Court has rightly
reduced the upset price.
7.With the above observations, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed
of. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Index :Yes/No 10.03.2022
Internet:Yes/No
ksa
To
The Additional District Court,
Dindigul.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.ANANTHI, J.
ksa
Order made in
C.R.P.(MD)No.1498 of 2021
10.03.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!