Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pitchaikani Ammal vs Marikani Ammal
2022 Latest Caselaw 4164 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4164 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 March, 2022

Madras High Court
Pitchaikani Ammal vs Marikani Ammal on 3 March, 2022
                                                                        CMA.(MD)No.85 of 2011

                         BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                            DATED : 03.03.2022

                                                 CORAM :

                         THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN

                                          CMA (MD)No.85 of 2011
                                                 and
                                           MP.(MD)No.1 of 2011

                  1.Pitchaikani Ammal
                  2. Sahadevan
                  3. Chandra
                  4. Jenagan
                  5. Velan
                  6. Sekar
                  7. Indirani
                  8. Saraswathi                                  ... Appellants


                                                   Vs.
                      Kannipalam Ammal (Died)
                     Jeyarajakani Ammal (Died)
                  1. Marikani Ammal
                  2. Rathinapandi Nadar
                  3. Ganapathi Pandi
                  4. Chandrasekar
                  5. Saraswathi                                  ...Respondents


                  1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                              CMA.(MD)No.85 of 2011

                  PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the
                  Motor Vehicles Act, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated
                  06.07.2010 in I.A No.94 of 2009 in A.S No.68 of 2004 on the file of the
                  Sub Court, Valliyoor.


                                  For Appellant     : Mr.P.Bala Murugan
                                                     for M/s. Jaya Paul Associates
                                  For Respondent    : Mr.S.J.Chakkaravarthy
                                                      for M/s.Eddy & Emboss Law Firm.


                                                   JUDGMENT

The appellant is the plaintiff in O.S.No.9 of 1988 before the

learned District Munsif, Valliyoor. The suit was filed for the relief of

recovery of possession. The appellant has also filed a suit in O.S.No.629 of

1988, before the same Court, for the relief of declaration of title to the suit

property and also for permanent injunction. After a common trial, both the

suits have been dismissed by a common judgement. Hence he has preferred

an appeal before the Principal Subordinate Court, Tirunelveli, in A.S.No.76

of 2004 which is made over to Principal District and Sessions Judge,

Tirunelveli and A.S.No.68 of 2004 is made over to the I Additional

Subordinate Judge, Tirunelveli.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA.(MD)No.85 of 2011

2.While, the A.S.No.76 of 2004, which is arising out of a

common judgment, is pending before the Principal Subordinate Judge,

Tirunelveli, the A.S.No.68 of 2004 was listed before the I Additional

Subordinate Judge, Tirunelveli and the same was dismissed for default on

02.08.2004. Hence the plaintiff / appellant has filed two interlocutory

applications. One under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the

delay and another IA to restore the first appeal which was dismissed for

default. The condone delay application in I.A.No.309 of 2007 was allowed

thereby, the delay of 1164 days was condoned. Consequently I.A.No.94 of

2009 for restoration of the appeal was taken up and the same was dismissed

and hence this Civil Miscellaneous appeal.

3.Heard the rival submissions made by the parties.

4.Arising out of a common judgment, A.S.No.9 of 1988 filed by

the one party and A.S.No.629 of 1988 filed by the other party, a common

judgment was rendered and two separate appeals have been filed.

However, by administrative action, one appeal was made over to I

Additional Subordinate Court. It has put a trial and it appears to be the

reason for the dismissal for default and hence an opportunity has to be

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA.(MD)No.85 of 2011

given since the other A.S.No.76 of 2004 is still pending with the Principal

Subordinate Judge, Tirunelveli.

5.Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is allowed. The

order dated 06.07.2010 made in I.A.No.94 of 2009 in A.S.No.68 of 2004

on the file of the I Additional Subordinate Judge, Tirunelveli, is set aside

and A.S.No.68 of 2004 is ordered to be restored to file and also directed to

be transferred to the Principal Subordinate Court, Tirunelveli, to be tried

along with A.S.No.76 of 2004 and the learned Principal Subordinate Judge,

Tirunelveli shall dispose of the same within a period of four months from

the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently,

connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

03.03.2022

Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes / No

pnn

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA.(MD)No.85 of 2011

To

1.The Principal Subordinate Judge, Tirunelveli.

2.The I Additional Subordinate Judge, Tirunelveli.

3.The Record Clerk, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA.(MD)No.85 of 2011

RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.

pnn

CMA (MD)No.85 of 2011 and MP.(MD)No.1 of 2011

03.03.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter