Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Anitha vs E.Vasantha Kumar
2022 Latest Caselaw 3820 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3820 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 March, 2022

Madras High Court
Anitha vs E.Vasantha Kumar on 1 March, 2022
                                                                               C.M.A.No.3504 of 2019

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                      Dated: 01.03.2022

                                                         CORAM

                                        THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA

                                                    C.M.A.No.3504 of 2019


                     Anitha                                                     ... Appellant

                                                          Versus

                     1.E.Vasantha Kumar

                     2.National Insurance Company Limited,
                     (Motor Third Party Cell),
                     No.751, Anna Salai, 3rd Floor,
                     Chennai – 600 002.                                         ...Respondents

                     Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor
                     Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Judgment and Decree dated 21.07.2016 and
                     made in M.A.C.T.O.P. No.4927 of 2014 on the file of the Motor Accident
                     Claims Tribunal, IV Court of Small Causes, Chennai.


                                  For Appellant           ...   Ms. M.Malar

                                  For Respondents         ...   Mr.S.Vadivel
                                                                for R2

                                                                R1- Ex-parte

                     1/8


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                         C.M.A.No.3504 of 2019




                                                             ORDER

Aggrieved by the meagre compensation passed by the Motor

Accident Claims Tribunal (IV Small Causes Court, Chennai) the claimant is

before this Court.

2. The brief facts preceding the filing of this appeal are as follows:-

2.1 The claimant has sustained injuries in a road accident on

28.04.2014. In the accident, she had suffered the following injuries:

a. Fracture of Pelvis;

b. Fracture of Superior pubic rami right side; c. Fracture spinous process of C4-C5; d. Severe head injury;

e. Multiple injuries all over the body.

2.2 The claimant had thereafter filed M.A.C.T.O.P. No.4927 of 2014

seeking compensation for a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Lakh).

The petition was filed against the owner of the motorcycle, which had

caused the accident and its insurer. However, both the respondents remained

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.3504 of 2019

ex-parte and ultimately, ex-parte award came to be passed. The Tribunal

held negligence with the rider of the first respondent vehicle and taking into

account the injuries and the period of treatment, etc., arrived at the

following compensation:

                                                     Heads                    Amount in
                                                                               Rupees
                                        Disability                                  1,20,000
                                        Pain and Suffering                            35,000
                                        Extra Nourishment                               4,000
                                        Transport to Hospital                           4,000

                                        Attender Charges                                7,400
                                        Medical expenses                                5,000
                                        Future Medical Expenses                         3,000
                                        Loss of Income                                13,000
                                        Loss of Amenities                               5,000
                                                                   Total            1,97,150
                                                            Rounded off             1,97,200


Challenging the same the appellant is before this Court.

3. The grievance of the appellant/ claimant are as follows:-

3.1. the notional income that was adopted was only at Rs.5,000/-

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.3504 of 2019

though the claimant had pleaded that she was a computer operator with

M/s.Venkateswara Enterprises, Maraimalai Nagar, Kanchipuram District

and also doing saree business, through which she would earn a sum of

Rs.13,500/- per month. She would also submit that the Tribunal had not

considered her injuries and had awarded only a sum of Rs.35,000/- towards

pain and sufferings. She has been admitted in the hospital as an in-patient

for 35 days and charges for the person, who attended her, has been awarded

only at a sum of Rs.7,400/- and that apart, loss of income of only a sum of

Rs.13,000/- has been awarded.

4. On the contrary, Mr.S.Vadivel appearing on behalf of the second

respondent Insurance Company would submit that the claimant has not

produced any proof to show that she has been working as computer operator

or that she is engaged in the business of selling sarees. Therefore, the

notional income of Rs.5,000/- was fair and he would also submit that the

claimant has not let in any evidence for the continuing disability to the

claimant.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.3504 of 2019

5. Heard the counsels appearing on either side.

6. The accident admittedly was in the year 2014. Though the claimant

has not produced any documents, even assuming that she was a home

maker, notional income should have been fixed at a sum of Rs.10,000/-. The

nature of injuries sustained by her, taking into account the evidence of

P.W.2 is a partial permanent one. Though P.W.2 has assessed the disability

at 90%, the Tribunal has taken a pragmatic view of the injuries and awarded

disability at 40%. Since the disability is a permanent partial one, the

compensation towards disability should have been calculated on a multiplier

basis. The appellant was aged 25 years and therefore a multiplier of 18

ought to have been taken. Therefore, taking into consideration 40% towards

disability and a monthly notional income of Rs.10,000/-, the compensation

under the head of disability would be Rs.8,64,000/- (Rs.10,000 x 12 x 18 x

40%). An additional sum of Rs.15,000/- can be awarded towards pain and

suffering, taking note of the area, where the appellant had suffered fracture.

A mere perusal of the discharge summary would show that the appellant had

been in inpatient for 33 days and would have suffered intense pain.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.3504 of 2019

Therefore, the amount under the head of pain and sufferings is enhanced to

Rs.50,000/-, for 33 days. The claimant had been in inpatient and being a

lady, she would definitely need an attendant with her, for which only a sum

of Rs.7,400/- has been awarded in this head and this is enhanced to a sum of

Rs.10,000/-. Likewise, the period of treatment and the post recuperation of

the claimant would have been for a period of six months, therefore, the loss

of income is enhanced as Rs.10,000/-. On all other heads the award of the

Tribunal is confirmed. Therefore, the award is modified and the following

compensation is awarded:

                                               Heads                Amount in Rupees
                                  Disability                                 8,64,000
                                  Pain and Suffering                          50,000
                                  Extra Nourishment                             4,000
                                  Transport to Hospital                         4,000

                                  Attender Charges                            10,000
                                  Medical expenses                              5,000
                                  Future Medical Expenses                       3,000
                                  Loss of Income                              60,000
                                  Loss of Amenities                             5,000
                                                            Total          10,05,760




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                C.M.A.No.3504 of 2019




7. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly allowed. The award

amount is therefore enhanced from Rs.1,97,200/- to Rs.10,05,760/-. No

Costs.

01.03.2022 gba/ab

To

1. Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, IV Court of Small Causes, Chennai.

2. The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court of Madras.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.3504 of 2019

P.T.ASHA. J.,

gba/ab

C.M.A.No.3504 of 2019

01.03.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter