Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Tmt.S.Sumathi vs The Secretary
2022 Latest Caselaw 9730 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9730 Mad
Judgement Date : 9 June, 2022

Madras High Court
Tmt.S.Sumathi vs The Secretary on 9 June, 2022
                                                                                W.P.No.8194 of 2014

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                              DATED : 09.06.2022

                                                    CORAM :

                            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

                                              W.P.No.8194 of 2014

                    Tmt.S.Sumathi                                              ... Petitioner

                                                        Vs.

                    1.The Secretary,
                      Tamil Nadu General and Distribution
                      Corporation Limited,
                      144 Anna Salai,
                      Chennai – 600 002.

                    2.The Chief Engineer (Personnel)
                      Tamil Nadu General and Distribution
                      Corporation Limited,
                      144 Anna Salai,
                      Chennai – 600 002.                                       ... Respondents

                    Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                    for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records
                    pertaining to the order passed by the 1st Respondent in his proceedings in
                    Memorandum No.90959/A1/A12/2013-2 dated 13.02.2014 and quash the
                    same, and direct the Respondents to give notional promotion to the
                    petitioner as Deputy Financial Controller from the date on which her
                    juniors was promoted and restore the seniority of the petitioner in the
                    cadre of Deputy Financial Controller and consider the petitioner for
                    further promotion to the post of Financial Controller along with others.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis


                    Page 1 of 5
                                                                                    W.P.No.8194 of 2014



                                             For Petitioner      : Mr.P.Ganesan

                                             For Respondents     : Mrs.S.Anitha
                                                                   Special Government Pleader


                                                          ORDER

The order of rejection dated 13.02.2014 rejecting the claim of the

writ petitioner retrospective promotion par with her Juniors is under

challenge in the present writ petition.

2. The petitioner states that she was appointed as Assistant

Accounts Officer on 30.06.2000 and thereafter, promoted to the post of

Accounts Officer on 03.11.2006. The next avenue of promotion is to the

post of Deputy Financial Controller. The petitioner was imposed with a

punishment of Censure on 21.04.2007 during the relevant point of time the

panel of persons in the cadre of accounts officer for promotion to the

Deputy Financial Controller were promoted and learned counsel for the

petitioner states that juniors to the writ petitioner were also promoted to

the said post of Deputy Financial Controller.

3. In view of the fact that the petitioner was suffering from

punishment of Censure on the crucial date. The crucial dated as per the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.8194 of 2014

petitioner was 01.01.2008 and the currency of punishment of Censure

expired on 24.01.2008. It is an admitted fact that after expiry of the

currency the petitioner was promoted to Deputy Financial Controller on

30.01.2008. The only contention of the petitioner is that, subsequently, the

Hon’ble Full Bench of this Court has quashed the check period in the case

of Deputy Inspector General Vs. V.Rani reported in 2011 (3) CTC 129.

4. This Court is of the considered opinion that the Full Bench of

judgment of the year 2011 cannot be retrospectively applied in respect of

the case, where the promotion was over looked in the year 2008 based on

the rules which was imposed.

5. This being the factum, the petitioner is not entitled for

retrospective promotion of the year 2008 and consequently, the impugned

order passed by the respondents stands confirmed and the Writ Petition

stands dismissed. No costs.


                                                                                         09.06.2022

                    Jeni/Ab

                    Internet : Yes
                    Index    : Yes
                    Speaking order : Yes

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.8194 of 2014

To

1.The Secretary, Tamil Nadu General and Distribution Corporation Limited, 144 Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

2.The Chief Engineer (Personnel) Tamil Nadu General and Distribution Corporation Limited, 144 Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.8194 of 2014

S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.

Jeni

W.P.No.8194 of 2014

09.06.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter