Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9518 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 June, 2022
S.A.(MD)No.273 of 2005
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 07.06.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA
S.A.(MD)No. 273 of 2005
M/s. Ajantha Cycle Mart,
rep. by one of its partner,
R.Nachiappan. ... Appellant /appellant/ 4th respondent
Vs.
1.P.M.A.S. Beemaraj
for himself and also as the Kartha
of the Joint Hindu Family
2.P.Kathirvel
3.P.Nagendravel
4.P.Murugeshwaran
5.M/s.V.P. Periyasamy Nadar,
a registered partnership firm,
rep. by its Partner,
A.Ramachandran ... Respondents
Prayer : Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 CPC as against the
Judgment and Decree, dated 23.09.2004 rendered in A.S.No.7 of 2004 on
the file of the Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Virudhunagar,
confirming the decree and the Judgment, dated 16.09.2003 rendered in
O.S.No.124 of 1996 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Virudhunagar.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.(MD)No.273 of 2005
For Appellant : No appearance
For 3rd respondent : Mr. S. Gokulraj
For Respondent Nos.1,2,4 and 5 : No appearance
JUDGMENT
When the second appeal came up for hearing on 06.06.2022,
there was no representation for the appellant and hence was directed to be
posted under the caption 'for dismissal' on 07.06.2022. Even today, i.e.,
07.06.2022 there is no representation for the appellant. The learned counsel
for the 3rd Respondent is present.
2. In view of the same, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non
prosecution. No costs.
07.06.2022
Index : Yes/No Internet :Yes/No trp
To
1. The Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Virudhunagar.
2. The Subordinate Judge, Virudhunagar.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.(MD)No.273 of 2005
R. HEMALATHA, J.,
trp
S.A.(MD)No. 273 of 2005
07.06.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!