Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Padmavathy @ S.Shrimathi vs C.Pragadeesh
2022 Latest Caselaw 11323 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11323 Mad
Judgement Date : 28 June, 2022

Madras High Court
Padmavathy @ S.Shrimathi vs C.Pragadeesh on 28 June, 2022
                                                                                    Tr.C.M.P.No.385 of 2022

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                   DATED : 28.06.2022

                                                        CORAM :

                                   THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA

                                               Tr.C.M.P.No.385 of 2022
                                              and C.M.P.No.7438 of 2022


                Padmavathy @ S.Shrimathi                                        ... Petitioner

                                                             Vs

                C.Pragadeesh                                                    ... Respondent

                (Cause title accepted vide Court dated 13.04.2022
                made in C.M.P. of 2022 in Tr.C.M.P.No.385/2022)

                Prayer:- Petition is filed under Section 24 of C.P.C., pleased to order withdrawal
                of H.M.O.P.No.1986 of 2021 from the file of the Additional Principal Family
                Court at Coimbatore and transfer the same to the Principal Subordinate Court,
                Virudhachalam.


                                       For Petitioner    :    Mr.G.Anabayachozhan
                                       For Respondent    :    No Appearance



                Page 1 / 4




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                    Tr.C.M.P.No.385 of 2022

                                                      ORDER

This Petition has been filed to withdraw H.M.O.P.No.1986 of 2021 pending

on the file of the Additional Principal Family Court, Coimbatore and transfer it to

the Principal Subordinate Court, Virudhachalam.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the materials

available on record. Though the notice was served on the respondent and his name

printed in the cause list, there is no representation on behalf of the respondent.

3. The petitioner is the wife and respondent is the husband. The marriage

between the petitioner and respondent was solemnized on 14.06.2019 as per

Hindu Rites and Customs. Since, the relationship between the couples went bitter,

the Respondent/Husband filed H.M.O.P.No.1986 of 2021, on the file of the

Additional Principal Family Court, Coimbatore, against the petitioner seeking

divorce. Now, the petitioner herein who is the wife has preferred the present

petition to withdraw H.M.O.P.No.1986 of 2021 pending on the file of the

Additional Principal Family Court, Coimbatore and transfer the same to the file of

the Principal Subordinate Court, Virudhachalam.

Page 2 / 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr.C.M.P.No.385 of 2022

4. The petitioner has stated that now she is residing with her parents and it

is very difficult for her to travel from Virudhachalam to Coimbatore, for attending

the Court proceedings at Coimbatore.

5. It is needless to state that in matrimonial proceedings, preference should

be given to the convenience of the wife. The said position has been settled in

various Judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and more particularly in the

Judgments reported in 2008 (9) SCC 353 [Arti Rani @ Pinki Devi and another

Vs. Dharmendra Kumar Gupta] and AIR 2002 SC 396 [Sumita Singh Vs.

Kumar Sanjay and another]. Infact as per the amended Section 19(iii-a) of the

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, the wife is guarded with the right to file proceedings in

the place where she resides. The above amendment was brought with the object of

facilitating the wife to participate in the matrimonial proceedings without any

hardship. In view of the above reasons, I feel that the prayer of the petitioner

should be considered favourably.

Page 3 / 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr.C.M.P.No.385 of 2022

R.N.MANJULA, J.

rgi

6. Accordingly, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed. The

petition in H.M.O.P.No.1986 of 2021 filed by the Respondent is ordered to be

withdrawn from the file of Additional Principal Family Court, Coimbatore and

transferred to the file of Principal Subordinate Court, Virudhachalam. The learned

Judge, Additional Principal Family Court, Coimbatore is directed to transmit all the

records pertaining to H.M.O.P.No.1986 of 2021 to the file of the Principal

Subordinate Court, Virudhachalam, within a period of two weeks from the date of

receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous

Petition is closed.


                                                                                         28.06.2022
                rgi
                Index       : Yes
                Internet    : Yes
                Speaking Order
                To

1.The Judge, Additional Principal Family Court, Coimbatore.

2.The Judge, Principal Subordinate Court, Virudhachalam.

Tr.C.M.P.No.385 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.7438 of 2022

Page 4 / 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter