Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10955 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 June, 2022
Crl.OP.No.6674 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23.06.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR
Crl.O.P. No.6674 of 2022 & Crl.M.P.Nos.3801 & 3804 of 2022
Syed Saif Hussain ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. State Rep. by The Inspector of Police,
J.2 Adyar Police Station [Law & Order]
Chennai – 600 002.
2. Sathyavani ... Respondents
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal
Procedure Code, to call for the records and quash the charge sheet in
C.C.No.1892 of 2020 on the file of the learned IX Metropolitan Magistrate,
Saidapet, Chennai against the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Abdul Mubeen
For Respondents : Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan
Additional Public Prosecutor – R1
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Page 1 of 5
Crl.OP.No.6674 of 2022
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the case in
C.C.No.1892 of 2020 on the file of the learned IX Metropolitan Magistrate,
Saidapet, Chennai for the offences under sections 379 and 411 of IPC.
2. The main contention of the petitioner is that no allegation has been
made against the petitioner and hence, seeks to quash the charge sheet filed
against him.
3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the
respondents submitted that there are prima facie materials against the
petitioner and witnesses have clearly spoken about the role played by the
petitioner in the commission of the offence and hence, prayed to dismiss this
petition.
4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the
learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the first respondent.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.6674 of 2022
5. On a perusal of the CD file, it is seen that the stolen articles have
been seized from the petitioner. The grounds that have been raised by the
learned counsel for the petitioner is purely factual in nature and the same
requires appreciation of evidence and this Court cannot go into the same by
conducting roving enquiry while exercising its jurisdiction under Section 482
of Cr.P.C. It is left open to the petitioner to raise all his defence before the
trial Court and the Court below shall consider the same on its own merits
and in accordance with law.
6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed with a
direction to the Court below to expedite the trial in accordance with the
guidelines given by Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in Vinod Kumar Vs
State of Punjab [2015 (1) MLJ (Crl) 288 SC]. If the petitioner adopts any
dilatory tactics, it is open to the trial Court to insist upon the presence of
the petitioner and remand him to custody as per the judgment of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. SHAMBHU
NATH SINGH (JT 2001 (4) SC 3191). Consequently, connected
miscellaneous petition is closed.
23.06.2022 vrc https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.6674 of 2022
To,
1. The Inspector of Police, J.2 Adyar Police Station [Law & Order] Chennai – 600 002.
2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.6674 of 2022
N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.
vrc
Crl.O.P. No.6674 of 2022
23.06.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!