Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10945 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 June, 2022
Crl.O.P.No.20744 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23.06.2022
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
Crl.O.P.No.20744 of 2020
1.R.Chandra
2.K.Raman ... Petitioners
Vs.
1.THE STATE
Represented by the Inspector of Police,
E1, Trichy Main Road,
Singanalur,
Coimbatore – 641005.
2.S.B.Parthiban ... Respondents
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal
Procedure Code, to issue a direction to the first respondent to arrest the
accused/second respondent in furtherance of executing the order of the
III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore in Criminal
Appeal No.77 of 2017 dated 24th June, 2020 confirming the order of the
Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magistrate Level II, Coimbatore
in CC.No.126 of 2017 dated 9th March, 2017.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/4
Crl.O.P.No.20744 of 2020
For Petitioners : Mr.P.Mahaadevan
For R1 : Mr.A.Gopinath
Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
ORDER
This petition has been filed to issue a direction to the first
respondent to execute the order of the III Additional District and
Sessions Judge, Coimbatore in Criminal Appeal No.77 of 2017 dated 24th
June, 2020 confirming the order of the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track
Court at Magistrate Level II, Coimbatore in CC.No.126 of 2017 dated 9th
March, 2017.
2. It is seen that the petitioner are the complainants in the
complaint lodged by them for the offence punishable under Section 138
of NI Act in C.C.No.126 of 2017 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate,
Fast Track Court at Magistrate Level II, Coimbatore. The Trail Court
found the second respondent guilty and sentenced him to undergo 1 year
simple imprisonment and also ordered compensation of the cheque
amount at interest to the tune of Rs.8,35,000/-.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.20744 of 2020
3. Aggrieved by the same, the second respondent preferred an
appeal before the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore,
in Criminal Appeal No.77 of 2017. The Appellate Court also confirmed
the conviction imposed by the Trial Court by the Judgment dated
24.06.2020. Though the first Appellate Court confirmed the conviction,
the petitioner failed to approach the Trial Court to execute the order
passed by the Trial Court. Therefore, the direction sought for in this
petition cannot be considered. However, the petitioners are at liberty to
approach the Trial Court for execution of the order passed by the Trial
Court and sought for issuance of Non Bailable Warrant as against the
second respondent herein. If any warrant is issued against the second
respondent, the first respondent is directed to execute the same in
accordance with law.
4. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is
disposed of.
23.06.2022
Internet : Yes / No
Index : Yes / No
Speaking / Non Speaking order
mn/cda
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.20744 of 2020
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
mn/cda
To
1.The Inspector of Police, E1, Trichy Main Road, Singanalur, Coimbatore – 641005.
2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
Crl.O.P.No.20744 of 2020
23.06.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!