Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10839 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 June, 2022
W.P. No. 15441 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22.06.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
W.P. No. 15441 of 2022
M.Sridharan,
S/o. Murugadass ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Superintendent of Police,
Cuddalore Dt.-607 001.
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Neyveli Township,
Cuddalore Dt.-607 803.
3. The Inspector of Police,
Thermal Police Station,
Neyveli, Cuddalore Dt.-607 807.
4. The Chairman,
Neyveli Lignite Corporation India (Ltd.),
Corporate Office,
Block-1, Neyveli – 607 801.
5. Joseph Peter Antony,
6. J. Andhony,
S/o. Joseph Peter Antony ... Respondents
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P. No. 15441 of 2022
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to
register F.I.R. basis on the 3rd respondent's CSR No.408/2021 dated
25.12.2021 and recover the cheated amount from the 5th and 6th
respondents.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Kanaka Velappan
For Respondents : Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan,
Additional Public Prosecutor.
For R1 to R3
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to direct the
3rd respondent to register the F.I.R. based on its CSR No.408/2021 and to
recover the cheated amount from 5th and 6th respondents.
2. Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor
for the respondents 1 to 3 would submit that based on the complaint given
by the petitioner, enquiry has been conducted and the same is pending on
the file of the third respondent police.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents 1 to 3.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No. 15441 of 2022
4. The Division Bench of this Court in G.Prabhakaran v. The
Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur, reported in (2018) 2 LW Crl 489 and
the Hon'ble Supreme Court in its latest judgment rendered by a three Judge
Bench in M.Subramaniam v. S.Janaki, reported in (2020) 5 CTC 464,
after relying upon Sakiri Vasu's Case, has categorically held that the High
Court cannot issue any direction for registration of FIR. High Court can
intervene only in extraordinary circumstances and rare cases. However,
taking note of the fact that the complaint is now pending and not been
enquired, the Investigation officer is directed to issue notice to the parties
and conduct enquiry as directed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of
Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others [2014 (2)
SCC (1)]. If any cognizable offence is made out, the 3rd respondent police is
bound to register the FIR otherwise they may close the complaint. Such
exercise shall be completed within a period of two weeks from today.
5. With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of.
22.06.2022 Internet:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non speaking order rpp/nr
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No. 15441 of 2022
N.SATHISH KUMAR,J.
Rpp/nr
To
1.The Superintendent of Police, Cuddalore Dt.-607 001.
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Neyveli Township, Cuddalore Dt.-607 803.
3. The Inspector of Police, Thermal Police Station, Neyveli, Cuddalore Dt.-607 807.
4. The Chairman, Neyveli Lignite Corporation India (Ltd.), Corporate Office, Block-1, Neyveli – 607 801.
5. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
W.P.No.15441 of 2022
22.06.2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!