Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 564 Mad
Judgement Date : 10 January, 2022
C.R.P.(NPD).No.2915 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10.01.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
C.R.P.(NPD).No.2915 of 2021
and
C.M.P.No.20952 of 2021
Manoranjitham .. Petitioner
Vs.
1.M/s.Universal Fertilizer Corporation,
A Registered Partnership Firm Rep by its
Managing Partner
P.Vijay Nataraj S/o.Periyasamy Gounder,
418 A, Suramangalam Main Road,
Pallipatty, Salem – 9.
2.Vimaladevi
3.Kavitha
4.Rajkumar .. Respondents
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution
of India, praying to set aside the fair and final order dated 03.09.2021 in
REA.No.53 of 2012 in REP.No.581 of 2011 in RCOP.No.41 of 2001 on the
file of IV Additional District Munsif Court, Salem and allow the above Civil
Revision Petition.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Nalliyappan
------------
Page No.1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.R.P.(NPD).No.2915 of 2021
ORDER
This Revision is filed by one of the legal representatives of the
judgment debtor who died after the order of eviction had become final.
2. The decree holder/ landlord sought to execute the decree for
eviction in RCOP.No.581 of 2011. The petitioner, who is the wife of the
deceased judgment debtor, had filed the application under Section 47 of the
Code of Civil Procedure seeking a prayer that the respondent is not entitled
to excess execution than the property leased to the petitioner under the rent
deed dated 26.04.1979.
3. The executing Court rightly rejected the application stating that the
prayer sought for does not come within the scope of Section 47 of the Code
of Civil Procedure viz., issue relating to execution, discharge and satisfaction
of the decree. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that the grounds of
challenge in execution under Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure lie in
a microscopic hole and does not enable the judgment debtor to resist
execution on all grounds.
------------
Page No.2/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(NPD).No.2915 of 2021
4. The learned trial Judge has examined the scope of Section 47 of the
Code of Civil Procedure exhaustively and had concluded that the prayer
sought for will not come within the Section 47 of the Code of Civil
Procedure. I do not see any reason to interfere with the order of the trial
Court refusing to entertain the petition under Section 47 of the Code of Civil
Procedure.
5. Hence, this Revision fails and it is accordingly dismissed. No
costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
10.01.2022
dsa Index : No Speaking order
To The IV Additional District Munsif Court, Salem.
------------
Page No.3/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(NPD).No.2915 of 2021
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
dsa
C.R.P.(NPD).No.2915 of 2021
10.01.2022
------------
Page No.4/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!